Lightweight, reduced density fire rated gypsum panels

ABSTRACT

A reduced weight, reduced density gypsum panel that includes high expansion vermiculite with fire resistance capabilities that are at least comparable to (if not better than) commercial fire rated gypsum panels with a much greater gypsum content, weight and density.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 15/457,466 filed Mar. 13, 2017, and entitled“Lightweight, Reduced Density Fire Rated Gypsum Panels,” which is acontinuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/181,590 filed Feb.14, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,623,586 and entitled “Lightweight, ReducedDensity Fire Rated Gypsum Panels,” which is a continuation of U.S.patent application Ser. No. 13/669,283 filed Nov. 5, 2012, now U.S. Pat.No. 8,702,881 and entitled “Method of Making Lightweight, ReducedDensity Fire Rated Gypsum Panels,” which is a continuation of U.S.patent application Ser. No. 13/400,010, filed Feb. 17, 2012, now U.S.Pat. No. 8,323,785 and entitled “Lightweight, Reduced Density Fire RatedGypsum Panels,” which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application No. 61/446,941, filed on Feb. 25, 2011, and entitled,“Lightweight, Reduced Density Fire Rated Gypsum Panels,” each of whichis incorporated in its entirety herein by this reference.

BACKGROUND

This disclosure generally pertains to reduced weight and density gypsumpanels with improved thermal insulation properties, heat shrinkageresistance, and fire resistance.

Gypsum panels typically used in building and other constructionapplications (such as a gypsum wallboard or ceiling panels) typicallycomprise a gypsum core with cover sheets of paper, fiberglass or othersuitable materials. Gypsum panels typically are manufactured by mixingcalcined gypsum, or “stucco,” with water and other ingredients toprepare a slurry that is used to form the core of the panels. Asgenerally understood in the art, stucco comprises predominately one ormore forms of calcined gypsum, i.e. gypsum subjected to dehydration(typically by heating) to form anhydrous gypsum or hemihydrate gypsum(CaSO₄.½H₂O). The calcined gypsum may comprise beta calcium sulfatehemihydrate, alpha calcium sulfate hemihydrate, water-soluble calciumsulfate anhydrite, or mixtures of any or all of these, from natural orsynthetic sources. When introduced into the slurry, the calcined gypsumbegins a hydration process which is completed during the formation ofthe gypsum panels. This hydration process, when properly completed,yields a generally continuous crystalline matrix of set gypsum dihydratein various crystalline forms (i.e. forms of CaSO₄.2H₂O).

During the formation of the panels, cover sheets typically are providedas continuous webs. The gypsum slurry is deposited as a flow or ribbonon a first of the cover sheets. The slurry is spread across the width ofthe first cover sheet at a predetermined approximate thickness to formthe panel core. A second cover sheet is placed on top of the slurry,sandwiching the gypsum core between the cover sheets and forming acontinuous panel.

The continuous panel typically is transported along a conveyer to allowthe core to continue the hydration process. When the core issufficiently hydrated and hardened, it is cut to one or more desiredsizes to form individual gypsum panels. The panels are then transferredinto and passed through a kiln at temperatures sufficient to dry thepanels to a desired free moisture level (typically relatively low freemoisture content).

Depending on the process employed and the expected use of the panels andother such considerations, additional slurry layers, strips or ribbonscomprising gypsum and other additives may be applied to the first orsecond cover sheets to provided specific properties to the finishedpanels, such as hardened edges or a hardened panel face. Similarly, foammay be added to the gypsum core slurry and/or other slurry strips orribbons at one or more locations in the process to provide adistribution of air voids within the gypsum core or portions of the coreof the finished panels.

The resulting panels may be further cut and processed for use in avariety of applications depending on the desired panel size, cover layercomposition, core compositions, etc. Gypsum panels typically vary inthickness from about ¼ inch to about one inch depending on theirexpected use and application. The panels may be applied to a variety ofstructural elements used to form walls, ceilings, and other similarsystems using one or more fastening elements, such as screws, nailsand/or adhesives.

Should the finished gypsum panels be exposed to relatively hightemperatures, such as those produced by high temperature flames orgases, portions of the gypsum core may absorb sufficient heat to startthe release of water from the gypsum dihydrate crystals of the core. Theabsorption of heat and release of water from the gypsum dihydrate may besufficient to retard heat transmission through or within the panels fora time. The gypsum panel can act as a barrier to prevent hightemperature flames from passing directly through the wall system. Theheat absorbed by the gypsum core can be sufficient to essentiallyrecalcine portions of the core, depending on the heat sourcetemperatures and exposure time. At certain temperature levels, the heatapplied to a panel also may cause phase changes in the anhydrite of thegypsum core and rearrangement of the crystalline structures. In someinstances, the presence of salts and impurities may reduce the meltingpoint of the gypsum core crystal structures.

Gypsum panels may experience shrinkage of the panel dimensions in one ormore directions as one result of some or all of these high temperatureheating effects, and such shrinkage may cause failures in the structuralintegrity of the panels. When the panels are attached to wall, ceilingor other framing assemblies, the panel shrinkage may lead to theseparation of the panels from other panels mounted in the sameassemblies, and from their supports, and, in some instances, collapse ofthe panels or the supports (or both). As a result, high temperatureflames or gases may pass directly into or through a wall or ceilingstructure.

Gypsum panels have been produced that resist the effects of relativelyhigh temperatures for a period of time, which may inherently delaypassage of high heat levels through or between the panels, and into (orthrough) systems using them. Gypsum panels referred to as fire resistantor “fire rated” typically are formulated to enhance the panels' abilityto delay the passage of heat though wall or ceiling structures and playan important role in controlling the spread of fire within buildings. Asa result, building code authorities and other concerned public andprivate entities typically set stringent standards for the fireresistance performance of fire rated gypsum panels.

The ability of gypsum panels to resist fire and the associated extremeheat may be evaluated by carrying out generally-accepted tests. Examplesof such tests are routinely used in the construction industry, such asthose published by Underwriters Laboratories (“UL”), such as the ULU305, U419 and U423 test procedures and protocols, as well as proceduresdescribed in the specifications E119 published by the American Societyfor Testing and Materials (ASTM). Such tests may comprise constructingtest assemblies using gypsum panels, normally a single-layer applicationof the panels on each face of a wall frame formed by wood or steelstuds. Depending on the test, the assembly may or may not be subjectedto load forces. The face of one side of the assembly, such as anassembly constructed according to UL U305, U419 and U423, for example,is exposed to increasing temperatures for a period of time in accordancewith a heating curve, such as those discussed in the ASTM E119procedures.

The temperatures proximate the heated side and the temperatures at thesurface of the unheated side of the assembly are monitored during thetests to evaluate the temperatures experienced by the exposed gypsumpanels and the heat transmitted through the assembly to the unexposedpanels. The tests are terminated upon one or more structural failures ofthe panels and/or when the temperatures on the unexposed side of theassembly exceed a predetermined threshold. Typically, these thresholdtemperatures are based on the maximum temperature at any one of suchsensors and/or the average of the temperature sensors on the unheatedside of the assembly.

Test procedures, such as those set forth in UL U305, U419 and U423 andASTM E119, are directed to an assembly's resistance to the transmissionof heat through the assembly as a whole. The tests also provide, in oneaspect, a measure of the resistance of the gypsum panels used in theassembly to shrinkage in the x-y direction (width and length) as theassembly is subjected to high temperature heating. Such tests alsoprovide a measure of the panels' resistance to losses in structuralintegrity that result in opening gaps or spaces between panels in a wallassembly, with the resulting passage of high temperatures into theinterior cavity of the assembly. In another aspect, the tests provide ameasure of the gypsum panels' ability to resist the transmission of heatthrough the panels and the assembly. It is believed that such testsreflect the specified system's capability for providing buildingoccupants and firemen/fire control systems a window of opportunity toaddress or escape fire conditions.

In the past, various strategies were employed to improve the fireresistance of fire rated gypsum panels. For example, thicker, denserpanel cores have been provided which use more gypsum relative to lessdense gypsum panels, and therefore include an increased amount of waterchemically bound within the gypsum (calcium sulfate dihydrate), to actas a heat sink, to reduce panel shrinkage, and to increase thestructural stability and strength of the panels. Alternatively, variousingredients including glass fiber and other fibers have beenincorporated into the gypsum core to enhance the gypsum panel's fireresistance by increasing the core's tensile strength and by distributingshrinkage stresses throughout the core matrix. Similarly, amounts ofcertain clays, such as those of less than about one micrometer size, andcolloidal silica or alumina additives, such as those of less than onemicrometer size, have been used in the past to provide increased fireresistance (and high temperature shrink resistance) in a gypsum panelcore. It has been recognized, however, that reducing the weight and/ordensity of the core of gypsum panels by reducing the amount of gypsum inthe core will adversely affect the structural integrity of the panelsand their resistance to fire and high heat conditions.

Another approach has been to add unexpanded vermiculite (also referredto as vermiculite ore) and mineral or glass fibers into the core ofgypsum panels. In such approaches, the vermiculite is expected to expandunder heated conditions to compensate for the shrinkage of the gypsumcomponents of the core. The mineral/glass fibers were believed to holdportions of the gypsum matrix together.

Such an approach is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,526,066 and 2,744,022,which discuss the use of comminuted unexfoliated vermiculate and mineraland glass fibers in proportions sufficient to inhibit the shrinkage ofgypsum panels under high temperature conditions. Both references,however, relied on a high density core to provide sufficient gypsum toact as a heat sink. They disclose the preparation of ½ inch thick gypsumpanels with a weight of, 2 to 2.3 pounds per square foot (2,000 to 2,300pounds per thousand square feet (“lb/msf”)) and board densities of about50 pounds per cubic foot (“pcf”) or greater.

The '066 patent reported that sections cut from such panels (with 2percent mineral fiber and 7.5% of minus 28 mesh vermiculite) evidencedup to 19.1% thickness expansion when heated at 1400° F. (760° C.) for 30minutes, but did not provide any information on the x-y directionshrinkage of those samples. The '066 patent further cautioned that,depending on the panel formulation and vermiculite content, vermiculiteexpansion could cause panel failures due to bulging panels and/or cracksand openings in the panels.

The '022 patent was directed at increasing the gypsum content (and thusdensity and weight) of the panels disclosed in the '066 patent byreducing the mineral/glass fiber content of those panels to provide agreater gypsum-heat sink capacity. References such as the '022 patentfurther recognized that the expansive properties of vermiculite, unlessrestrained, would result in spalling (that is, fragmenting, peeling orflaking) of the core and destruction of a wall assembly in a relativelyshort time at high temperature conditions.

In another example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,454,456 describes the introductionof unexpanded vermiculite into the core of fire rated gypsum wallboardpanels to resist the shrinkage of the panels. The '456 patent alsorelies on a relatively high gypsum content and density to provide adesired heat sink capacity. The '456 patent discloses board weights forfinished ½ inch gypsum panels of with a minimum weight of about 1925lb/msf, and a board density of about 46 pcf. This is a densitycomparable to thicker and much heavier ⅝ inch thick gypsum panels (about2400 lb/msf) presently offered commercially for fire rated applications.

The '456 patent also discloses that using vermiculite in a gypsum panelcore to raise the panel's fire rating is subject to significantlimitations. For example, the '456 patent notes that the expansion ofthe vermiculite within the core may cause the core to disintegrate dueto spalling and other destructive effects. The '456 patent alsodiscloses that unexpanded vermiculite particles may so weaken the corestructure that the core becomes weak, limp, and crumbly. The '456 patentpurports to address such significant inherent limitations with the useof vermiculite in gypsum panels by employing a “unique” unexpandedvermiculite with a relatively small particle size distribution (morethan 90% of the unexpanded particles smaller than a No. 50 mesh size(approximately 0.0117 inch (0.297 mm) openings), with less than 10%slightly larger than no. 50 mesh size). This approach purportedlyinhibited the adverse effects of vermiculite expansion on the panel, asexplained at col. 2, 11. 52-72 of the '456 patent.

The '456 patent, in addition, explains that the unexpanded vermiculitehaving the above described particle size distribution corresponds to aproduct known commercially as “Grade No. 5” unexpanded vermiculite.Grade No. 5 unexpanded vermiculite has been used in commercial fireresistant/fire rated panels with gypsum cores of conventional boarddensities (for example, from about 45 pcf to in excess of about 55 pcf)since at least the early 1970s. For the reasons discussed above, the useof unexpanded vermiculite comprising a significant distribution ofparticles with sizes larger than those typical of Grade No. 5 unexpandedvermiculite has been considered potentially destructive of fireresistance panels due to the above mentioned spalling and other effectscaused by the expansion of the vermiculite within a gypsum core at hightemperature conditions.

In another approach, U.S. Pat. No. 3,616,173 is directed to fireresistant gypsum panels with a gypsum core characterized by the '173patent as a lighter weight or lower density. The '173 patentdistinguished its panels from prior art ½ inch panels weighing about2,000 lb/msf or more and having core densities in excess of about 48pcf. Thus, the '173 patent discloses ½ inch thick panels with a densityof at or above about 35 pcf, and preferably about 40 pcf to about 50pcf. The '173 patent achieves its disclosed core densities byincorporating significant amounts of small particle size inorganicmaterial of either clay, colloidal silica, or colloidal alumina in itsgypsum core, as well as glass fibers in amounts required to prevent theshrinkage of its gypsum panels under high temperature conditions.

The '173 patent discloses the further, optional addition of unexpandedvermiculite to its gypsum core composition, along with the requiredamounts of its disclosed small particle size inorganic materials. Evenwith these additives, however, the disclosed testing of each of the '173patent's panels showed that they experienced significant shrinkage. Thatshrinkage occurred notwithstanding the fact that each of the tested anddisclosed panels had core densities of about 43 pcf or greater.

For ½ inch thick gypsum panels, the '173 patent's disclosed panels havea “shrink resistance” from about 60% to about 85%. “Shrink resistance”as used in the '173 patent is a measure of the proportion or percentageof the x-y (width-length) area of a segment of core that remains afterthe core is heated to a defined temperature over a defined period oftime as described in the '173 patent. See, e.g., col. 12, 11. 41-49.

Other efforts also have been made to increase the strength andstructural integrity of gypsum panels and reduce panel weight by variousmeans. Examples of such light weight gypsum boards include, U.S. Pat.Nos. 7,731,794 and 7,736,720 and U.S. Patent Application PublicationNos. 2007/0048490 A1, 2008/0090068 A1, and 2010/0139528 A1.

Finally, it is noted that in the absence of water resistant additives,when immersed in water, set gypsum can absorb water up to 50% of itsweight. And, when gypsum panels—including fire resistant gypsumpanels—absorb water, they can swell, become deformed and lose strengthwhich may degrade their fire-resistance properties. Low weightfire-resistant panels have far more air and/or water voids thanconventional, heavier fire-resistant panels. These voids would beexpected to increase the rate and extent of water uptake, with theexpectation that such low weight fire-resistant panels would be morewater absorbent than conventional heavier fire-resistant panels.

Many attempts have been made in the past to improve the water resistanceof gypsum panels generally. Various hydrocarbons, including wax, resinsand asphalt have been added to the slurries used to make gypsum panelsin order to impart water resistance to the panels. Siloxanes also havebeen used in gypsum slurries imparting water resistance to gypsum panelsby forming silicone resins in situ. Siloxanes, however, would not beexpected to sufficiently protect low weight panels. Thus there is a needin the art for a method of producing low weight and densityfire-resistant gypsum panels with improved water-resistance atreasonable cost by enhancing the water resistance normally imparted bysiloxanes.

SUMMARY

In some embodiments, the present disclosure describes a reduced-weight,reduced-density gypsum panel—and methods for making such panels—havingfire resistance properties comparable to heavier, denser gypsum panelstypically used for construction applications where a fire rating isrequired. In some embodiments, panels formed according to principles ofthe present disclosure comprise a set gypsum core with a core density ofless than about 40 pounds per cubic foot (“pcf”) disposed between twocover sheets. In embodiments of such panels that are ⅝-inch thick, theweight is approximately less than about 2100 lb/msf.

In some embodiments, high expansion particulates, such as high expansionvermiculite, for example, can be incorporated in the gypsum core inamounts effective to provide fire resistance in terms of shrinkageresistance comparable to commercial Type X gypsum panels and other muchheavier and denser gypsum panels. The high expansion particles can havea first unexpanded phase and a second expanded phase when heated. Suchpanels can further provide fire resistance in terms of x-y direction(width-length) High Temperature Shrinkage and thermal insulationproperties, as well as z-direction (thickness) High TemperatureThickness Expansion properties, that is comparable to or significantlygreater than commercial Type X gypsum panels and other much heavier anddenser commercial panels, including those commercial gypsum panelscontaining Grade No. 5 vermiculite. In yet other embodiments, panelsformed according to principles of the present disclosure can providefire performance in assemblies such as those subject to industrystandard fire tests that is comparable to at least commercial Type Xgypsum panels and other heavier and denser commercial panels. Suchindustry standard fire tests include, without limitation, those setforth in the procedures and specifications of UL U305, U419 and U423full scale fire tests and fire tests that are equivalent to those.

In other embodiments, reduced weight and density gypsum panels formedaccording to principles of the present disclosure, and the methods formaking same, can provide High Temperature Shrinkage (at temperatures ofabout 1560° F. (850° C.)) of less than about 10% in the x-y directionsand expansion in the z-direction of greater than about 20%. In someembodiments, the ratio of z-direction High Temperature ThicknessExpansion to High Temperature Shrinkage is greater than about 0.2 insome embodiments, greater than about 2 in other embodiments, in someembodiments greater than about 3, in other embodiments greater thanabout 7, in still other embodiments from over about 17, and yet otherembodiments from about 2 to about 17. In other embodiments, reducedweight and density gypsum panels formed according to principles of thepresent disclosure, and the methods for making same, can provide ashrink resistance of greater than about 85% in the x-y directions attemperatures of in excess of about 1800° F. (980° C.).

In yet other embodiments, a fire resistant gypsum panel formed accordingto principles of the present disclosure, and the methods for makingsame, can include a gypsum core disposed between two cover sheets. Thegypsum core can comprise a crystalline matrix of set gypsum and highexpansion particles expandable to about 300% or more of their originalvolume after being heated for about one hour at about 1560° F. (about850° C.). The gypsum core can have a density (D) of about 40 pounds percubic foot or less and a core hardness of at least about 11 pounds (5kg). The gypsum core can be effective to provide a Thermal InsulationIndex (TI) of about 20 minutes or greater.

In other embodiments, assemblies made using reduced weight and density ⅝inch thick gypsum panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure can provide fire resistance that is comparable to (or betterthan) assemblies using much heavier denser gypsum panels when tested inaccordance with the UL U305, U419 and U423 fire test procedures. Thefire resistance of panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure can be reflected by the maximum single sensor temperature orthe average sensor temperature on the unexposed surface of suchassemblies made pursuant to the UL U305, U419 and U423 fire testprocedures (and equivalent fire test procedures). In some embodiments,assemblies made using panels formed according to principles of thepresent disclosure and tested pursuant to UL U419 provides a maximumsingle sensor temperature of less than about 500° F. (260° C.) and/or anaverage sensor temperature of less than about 380° F. (195° C.) at about60 minutes elapsed time. In some embodiments, assemblies made usingpanels formed according to principles of the present disclosure andtested pursuant to UL U419 provides a maximum single sensor temperatureof less than about 260° F. and/or an average sensor temperature of lessthan about 250° F. at about 50 minutes elapsed time. In otherembodiments, assemblies using panels formed according to principles ofthe present disclosure in such UL U419 tests can provide a maximumsingle sensor temperature of less than about 410° F. and/or an averagesensor temperature of less than about 320° F. at about 55 minutes. Inyet other embodiments, assemblies using panels formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure in such tests can provide a maximumsingle sensor temperature of less than about 300° F. and/or an averagesensor temperature of less than about 280° F. at about 55 minuteselapsed time.

In other embodiments, an assembly of gypsum panels formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure can exhibit fire resistance intesting under the UL U419 procedures reflected by a maximum singlesensor temperature of less than about 500° F. and/or an average sensortemperature of less than about 380° F. at about 60 minutes elapsed time.In yet other embodiments, assemblies using panels formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure can in such tests experience amaximum single sensor temperature of less than about 415° F. and/or anaverage sensor temperature of less than about 320° F. at about 60minutes elapsed time. In certain of such embodiments, gypsum panelsformed according to principles of the present disclosure can have a corewith a density of less than about 40 pcf that satisfies the requirementsfor a 60 minute fire rated gypsum panel under one or more of the firetest procedures of UL U305, U419 and U423 and other fire test proceduresthat are equivalent to any one of those.

In still other embodiments, the formulation for reduced weight anddensity of panels following principles of the present disclosure, andthe methods for making them, can provide gypsum panels with theabove-mentioned fire resistance properties, a density less than about 40pcf and a nail pull resistance that can meet the standards of ASTM C1396/C 1396/M-09. More particularly, such panels, when having a nominal⅝-inch thickness, can have a nail-pull resistance of at least 87 lb.Moreover, in other embodiments, such panels provide sound transmissioncharacteristics essentially the same as much heavier and denser panels.In some embodiments, ⅝ inch thick panels formed according to principlesof the present disclosure can have sound transmission class ratings ofat least about 35 when mounted on an assembly of steel studs pursuant tothe testing and procedures of ASTM E90-99.

In yet other embodiments, a set gypsum core composition for a nominal⅝-inch fire-rated panel is provided using gypsum-containing slurrycomprising at least water, stucco, and high expansion vermiculite. Inone such embodiment, the set gypsum core has a density of from about 30pcf to about 40 pcf, and the core comprises stucco in an amount fromabout 1162 lbs/msf to about 1565 lbs/msf, high expansion vermiculitefrom about 5% to about 10% by weight of the stucco, and mineral or glassfiber from about 0.3% to about 0.9% by weight of the stucco. (Unlessotherwise stated, the percentages of the component of the gypsum coreare stated by weight based on the weight of the stucco used to preparethe core slurry). In another embodiment, the set gypsum core has adensity of from about 30 pcf to about 40 pcf, and the core comprisesstucco in an amount from about 1162 lbs/msf to about 1565 lbs/msf, highexpansion vermiculite from about 5% to about 10% by weight of thestucco, starch from about 0.3% to about 3% by weight of the stucco,mineral or glass fiber from about 0.3% to about 0.9% by weight of thestucco, and phosphate from about 0.03% to about 0.4% by weight of thestucco.

In other embodiments, the gypsum core of ⅝ inch thick panels formedaccording to principles of the present disclosure can have a density offrom about 32 to about 38 pounds per cubic foot, and a gypsum coreweight from about 1500 to about 1700 lb/msf. In some embodiments, thegypsum core can include about 5.5% to about 8% high expansionvermiculite, about 0.4% to about 0.7% mineral or glass fiber, and about0.07% to about 0.25% phosphate. In other embodiments, the gypsum corecan include about 5.5% to about 8% high expansion vermiculate, about0.5% to about 2.5% starch, about 0.4% to about 0.7% mineral or glassfiber, and about 0.07% to about 0.25% phosphate. In yet otherembodiments, each of the components of the gypsum core, such as thestarch, fiber and phosphate content, can be further adjusted to providedesired panel properties, and in view of the composition and weight ofthe cover sheets, other additives to the panel core, and the quality ofthe gypsum stucco.

Each of the gypsum core constituents described herein also may be variedappropriately for panels of different thicknesses, as will beappreciated by one skilled in the art. For example, ½ inch panels mayhave gypsum lb/msf values at about 80% of the stated values, and a ¾inch panels may have lb/msf values at about 120% of the stated values.In some embodiments, these proportions can vary depending on thephysical property specifications for different thickness panels. Otheraspects and variations of panels and core formulations in keeping withprinciples of the present disclosure are discussed herein below.

Other conventional additives also can be employed in core slurries andgypsum core compositions disclosed herein, in customary amounts, toimpart desirable properties to the core and to facilitate manufacturingprocesses. Examples of such additives are: set accelerators, setretarders, dehydration inhibitors, binders, adhesives, dispersing aids,leveling or non-leveling agents, thickeners, bactericides, fungicides,pH adjusters, colorants, water repellants, fillers, aqueous foams, andmixtures thereof.

In panels formed according to principles of the present disclosure, andthe methods of making the same, aqueous foam can be added to the coreslurry in an amount effective to provide the desired gypsum coredensities, using methods further discussed below. In some embodiments,the addition of the foam component to the core slurry can result in adistribution of voids and void sizes in the presence of the vermiculitecomponent of the core that contributes to one or more panel and/or corestrength properties. Similarly, additional slurry layers, strips orribbons comprising gypsum and other additives (which may have anincreased density relative to other portions of the core) may be appliedto the first or second cover sheets to provide specific properties tothe finished panels, such as harder edges.

In other embodiments, the present disclosure describes a method ofmaking fire rated gypsum panels where the set gypsum core component isformed from calcined gypsum-containing aqueous slurry. In someembodiments, the slurry can include high expansion vermiculite, starch,dispersants, phosphates, mineral/glass fibers, foam, other additives inthe amounts described above, stucco and water at a water/stucco weightratio of about 0.6 to about 1.2, preferably about 0.8 to about 1.0, andmore preferably about 0.9. The core slurry can be deposited as acontinuous ribbon on and distributed over a continuous web of firstcover sheet. A continuous web of a second cover sheet can be placed overthe slurry deposited on the web of first cover sheet to form a generallycontinuous gypsum panel of a desired approximate thickness. Thegenerally continuous gypsum panel can be cut into individual panels of adesired length after the calcined gypsum-containing slurry has hardened(by hydration of the calcined gypsum to form a continuous matrix of setgypsum) sufficiently for cutting, and the resulting gypsum panels can bedried.

As will be appreciated, the principles related to gypsum panelsdisclosed herein are capable of being carried out in other and differentembodiments, and capable of being modified in various respects. Furtherand alternative aspects and features of the disclosed principles will beappreciated from the following detailed description and the accompanyingdrawings. Accordingly, it is to be understood that both the foregoinggeneral summary and the following detailed description are exemplary andexplanatory only and do not restrict the scope of the appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed incolor. Copies of this patent or patent application publication withcolor drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and paymentof the necessary fee.

The Figures listed and further discussed below, unless otherwiseexpressly stated, are exemplary of, and not limiting to, the inventiondisclosed herein.

FIG. 1 is a two dimensional image developed from a micro CT-X-ray scan,as further discussed below, of a core section of a specimen from anominal ⅝ inch thick, about 1880 lb/msf exemplary panel formed accordingto principles of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a three dimensional image developed from a micro CT-X-rayscan, as further discussed below, of a core section of the specimenshown in FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a three dimensional volume rendered image developed from amicro CT-X-ray scan, as further discussed below, of a core section ofthe specimen shown in FIG. 1.

FIG. 4 is a two dimensional image developed from a micro CT-X-ray scan,as further discussed below, of a core section of a specimen from anominal ⅝ inch thick, about 1860 lb/msf exemplary panel formed accordingto principles of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a three dimensional image developed from a micro CT-X-rayscan, as further discussed below, of a core section of the specimenshown in FIG. 4.

FIG. 6 is a three dimensional volume rendered image developed from amicro CT-X-ray scan, as further discussed below, of a core section ofthe specimen shown in FIG. 4.

FIG. 7 is a perspective view of an embodiment of a representativeassembly constructed in accordance with UL U305, UL U419, UL U423,and/or equivalent fire test and including gypsum panels formed accordingto principles of the present disclosure, the gypsum panels being shownin fragmentary form and joint tape and compound removed for illustrativepurposes.

FIG. 8 is an elevational view of the assembly of FIG. 7 from theunexposed surface that includes a plurality of temperature sensors inaccordance with UL U305, UL U419, UL U423, and/or equivalent fire test.

FIG. 9 is a plot of the maximum single sensor temperature at theunexposed surface of each of the assemblies made with panels from SampleRuns 1 to 17 and 22 described herein and subjected to fire testing underthe condition of UL U419 (as discussed below), from 0 minutes elapsed tothe termination of the tests, and a plot of the ASTM E119 temperaturecurve used for the furnace temperatures in the tests.

FIG. 10 shows a plot of the average sensor temperatures at the unexposedsurface of each of the assemblies from the UL U419 fire tests that arethe subject of FIG. 9, from 0 minutes to the termination of the tests,and the ASTM E119 temperature curve used for the furnace temperatures insuch tests.

FIG. 11 is an expanded plot of the maximum single sensor temperaturesfrom the U419 fire tests that are the subject of FIG. 9 for theassemblies using the panels of Sample Runs 1 to 17 and 21, from 40minutes to 65 minutes elapsed time.

FIG. 12 is an expanded plot of the average of the sensor temperaturesfrom the UL U419 fire tests that are the subject of FIG. 10 for theassemblies using the panels of Sample Runs 1 to 17 and 21, from 40minutes to 65 minutes elapsed time.

FIG. 13 is a plot of the data from FIG. 11 for the assemblies using thepanels of Sample Runs 5, 14, and 21.

FIG. 14 is a plot of the data from FIG. 12 for the assemblies using thepanels of Sample Runs 5, 14, and 21.

FIG. 15 is an expanded plot of the maximum single sensor temperatures atthe unexposed surface of each of the assemblies using the panels ofSample Runs 18 and 22 that were subjected to fire testing under theconditions of UL U423 (as discussed below), from 40 minutes to 65minutes elapsed time.

FIG. 16 is an expanded plot of the average sensor temperatures at theunexposed surface of each of the assemblies using the panels of SampleRuns 18 and 22 from the UL U423 fire tests that are to be subject ofFIG. 15, from 40 minutes 65 minutes elapsed time.

FIG. 17 is an expanded plot of the maximum single sensor temperatures atthe unexposed surface of assemblies using panels from Sample Runs 19 and20 that were subjected to fire testing under the conditions of UL U305(as discussed below), tests from 40 minutes to 65 minutes elapsed time.

FIG. 18 is an expanded plot of the average sensor temperature at theunexposed surface of each of the assemblies using the panels of SampleRuns 19 and 20 from the UL U305 tests that are the subject of FIG. 17,from 40 minutes to 60 minutes elapsed time.

FIG. 19 is a table (Table I) of exemplary formulations for gypsum panelsformed according to principles of the present disclosure.

FIG. 20 is a table (Table II) of weight loss and density changes withtemperature of vermiculite Grade No. 5.

FIG. 21 is a table (Table III) of weight loss and density changes withtemperature of high expansion vermiculite.

FIG. 22 is a table (Table IV) of statistical information of air voiddistributions of Specimens 1-4.

FIG. 23 is a table (Table V) of statistical information of wallthickness distributions of Specimens 1-4.

FIG. 24 is a table (Table VI) of shrink resistance test results.

FIGS. 25a-b are a table (Table VII) of major components of formulations(average values of each run, unless otherwise noted) for sample panelsreferenced in Example 4

FIGS. 26a-b are a table (Table VIII) of High Temperature Shrinkage andHigh Temperature Thickness Expansion testing of specimens from sampleruns referenced in Table VII and Example 4B.

FIG. 27 is a table (Table IX) of predicted minimum Thermal InsulationIndex values for desired fire resistance at 50, 55, and 60 minutes inassemblies using panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure.

FIGS. 28a-b are a table (Table X) of high temperature thermal insulationtesting of specimens from sample runs referenced in Table VII andExample 4D.

FIGS. 29a-c are a table (Table XI) of data from fire testing ofspecimens from sample runs referenced in Table VII and Example 4E.

FIG. 30 is a table (Table XII) of data from nail pull resistance testingof specimens from samples runs referenced in Table VII and Example 5.

FIG. 31 is a table (Table XIII) of data from flexural strength testingof specimens from sample runs 17, 18, and 19.

FIGS. 32a-c are a table (Table XIV) of data from core, end, and edgehardness testing of specimens from sample runs 17, 18, and 19.

FIG. 33 is a table (Table XV) of data from sound transmission losstesting of examples of gypsum panels formed according to principles ofthe present disclosure and Type X commercial fire-rated gypsum panels.

FIGS. 34a-b are a table (Table XVI) of lab evaluation of siloxane/starchtreated panels.

FIG. 35 is a table (Table XVII) of High Temperature Shrinkage and HighTemperature Thickness Expansion testing of specimens from laboratorysamples referenced in Example 10.

FIG. 36 is a table (Table XVII) of High Temperature Thermal InsulationIndex testing of specimens from laboratory samples referenced in Example10.

FIG. 37 is a table (Table XIX) of formulations for laboratory sampleswith varying amounts of vermiculite.

FIGS. 38a-c are tables (Table XXa-c) of High Temperature InsulationIndex, High Temperature Shrinkage, and High Temperature ThermalExpansion testing of Exhibit 11 A, Samples 1-9, with varying amounts ofaluminum trihydrate (ATH).

FIG. 39 is a plot of the amount of ATH as a percentage weight by weightof the stucco versus the High Temperature Insulation Index taken fromtesting data in Table XXb of FIG. 38a for Exhibit 11A, Samples 3-9.

FIGS. 40a-c are tables (Table XXIa-c) of High Temperature InsulationIndex, High Temperature Shrinkage, and High Temperature ThermalExpansion testing of Example 11B, Samples 10-17, with varying amounts ofATH.

FIGS. 41a-b are tables (Table XXIIa and XXIIb) of High TemperatureInsulation Index, High Temperature Shrinkage, and High TemperatureThermal Expansion testing of Exhibit 11C, Samples 18-20 with ATH.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The embodiments described below are not intended to be exhaustive or tolimit the appended claims to the specific compositions, assemblies,methods and operations disclosed herein. Rather, the described aspectsand embodiments have been chosen to explain principles of the presentdisclosure and its application, operation and use in order to bestenable others skilled in the art to follow its teachings.

The present disclosure provides embodiments using combinations ofstucco, high expansion particulates, such as high expansion vermiculite,in an unexpanded condition, and other noted ingredients, examples ofwhich are mentioned in Table I in FIG. 19. These formulations providefire resistant, reduced weight and density gypsum panels that providedesired fire resistance properties not previously believed feasible forgypsum panels of such reduced weights and densities. Panels formedaccording to principles of the present disclosure can also havenail-pull resistance and sound transmission characteristics suitable fora variety of construction purposes, and, in some embodiments, suchproperties are comparable to significantly heavier, denser commercialfire rated panels. The unique formulations of and methods of makingpanels formed according to principles of the present disclosure make itpossible to produce such high performing, reduced weight and density,fire resistance gypsum panels with High Temperature Shrinkage of lessthan about 10% in the x-y directions (width-length) and High TemperatureThickness Expansion in the z-direction (thickness) of greater than about20% when heated to about 1560° F. (850° C.). In yet other embodiments,when used in wall or other assemblies, such assemblies have fire testingperformance comparable to assemblies made with heavier, densercommercial fire rated panels.

In yet other embodiments, a fire resistant gypsum panel formed accordingto principles of the present disclosure, and the methods for makingsame, can include a gypsum core disposed between two cover sheets. Thegypsum core can comprise a crystalline matrix of set gypsum and highexpansion particles expandable to about 300% or more of their originalvolume after being heated for about one hour at about 1560° F. (about850° C.). The gypsum core can have a density (D) of about 40 pounds percubic foot or less and a core hardness of at least about 11 pounds (5kg). The gypsum core can be effective to provide a Thermal InsulationIndex (TI) of about 20 minutes or greater. The gypsum core can beeffective to provide the panel with a ratio of TI/D of about 0.6minutes/pounds per cubic foot (0.038 minutes/(kg/m³)) or more.

In some embodiments, a fire resistant gypsum panel formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure, and the methods for making same,can provide a panel that exhibits an average shrink resistance of about85% or greater when heated at about 1800° F. (980° C.) for one hour. Inother embodiments, the panel exhibits an average shrink resistance ofabout 75% or greater when heated at about 1800° F. (980° C.) for onehour.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure provides ⅝ inch thick gypsumpanels with a gypsum core density of less than about 40 pcf. In otherpreferred embodiments, the panel gypsum core densities are from about 30pcf to about 40 pcf; about 32 pcf to about 38 pcf; or about 35 to about37 pcf. Such panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure provide fire resistance properties comparable to much heavierand denser gypsum panels, such as current, commercial ⅝″ Type X (firerated) fire rated, gypsum panels, which typically have a core density ofat least about 42 pcf (and a ⅝ inch thick panel weight of at least about2200 lb/msf), such as SHEETROCK® Brand FIRE CODE® Type X panels.

In other embodiments, methods are provided for making fire resistantgypsum panels by preparing a calcined gypsum containing aqueous slurrywith the components discussed herein below, where the calcined gypsum(also referred to as stucco) and water are used to create an aqueousslurry at a preferred water/stucco weight ratio of about 0.6 to about1.2 in some embodiments, about 0.8 to about 1.0 in other embodiments,and about 0.9 in yet other embodiments. The slurry is deposited as acontinuous ribbon on a continuous cover sheet web of paper, unwovenfiberglass, or other fibrous materials or combination of fibrousmaterials. A second such continuous cover sheet web is then placed overthe deposited slurry ribbon to form a continuous gypsum panel of thedesired thickness and width. The continuous gypsum panel is cut to adesired length after the calcined gypsum-containing slurry has hardened(by hydration of the calcined gypsum to form a continuous matrix of setgypsum) sufficiently for cutting, and the resulting gypsum panels aredried. The dried panels, in addition, may be subject to further cutting,shaping and trimming steps.

In other embodiments, a higher density gypsum layer may be formed at orabout the first cover sheet and/or along the peripheral edges of thecover sheet. The higher density layer typically provides beneficialproperties to the board surfaces, such as increased hardness improvednail pull strength etc. The higher density along the peripheral edges ofthe cover sheet typically provides improved edge hardness and otherbeneficial properties. In yet other embodiments, a higher density layeris applied to either or both cover sheets, or to the equivalent portionsof the core/cover sheet construction.

Typically, the higher density layers are applied by conventionaltechniques such as coating one or both of the cover layers upstream ofor in close proximity to the deposition of the core layer on the firstcover sheet or the application of the second cover sheet over the coreslurry layer. Similarly, the peripheral higher density layer often isapplied as a strip or narrow ribbon of gypsum slurry (with a densitydiffering from the core slurry) to the peripheral edges of the firstcover sheet upstream of or in proximity to the deposition of the coreslurry on the first sheet. In some of such embodiments, the higherdensity layers comprise about 3% to about 4% of the board weight.

Accordingly, in some embodiments, a reduced weight and density, fireresistant gypsum panel suitable for use as wallboard, ceiling board orother construction applications (such as exterior sheathing, roofingmaterial, etc.) is provided. In certain of such embodiments, the gypsumpanels have a nominal thickness suitable for use in constructionapplications, such as about ⅝ inches, about ½ inches and/or about ¼inches, which are typical thicknesses used for many interior andexterior building applications. The cover sheets also may be coated withwater-resistant or abuse-resistant coatings or, in some applications,gypsum, cementations materials, acrylic materials or other coatingssuitable for specific construction needs. The panels also may be formedin a variety of dimensions suitable for standard, non-standard, orcustom applications. Examples of such panels are nominal four feet widepanels having a nominal length of eight feet, ten and twelve feettypical of those used for building construction purposes.

The core density of the reduced weight, fire resistant panels is asignificant contributor to the overall weight of the panels relative toconventional panels with similar dimensions. Thus, in embodiments withthe above-mentioned core densities, the panel densities with typicalpaper cover sheets can include from about 30 pcf to about 39.5 pcf;about 32.7 pcf to about 38.5 pcf; and about 35.6 pcf to about 37.5 pcf.For ⅝ inch thick, four foot by eight foot panels, with such paneldensities, the panel weights can be about 1600 lb/msf to about 2055lb/msf, about 1700 lb/msf to about 2000 lb/msf, and 1850 lb/msf to about1950 lb/msf, respectively. For other panel thicknesses and dimensions,the weight of the panels may be varied proportionally. For example, inthe case of panels having similar densities but with a nominal ½ inchthickness, the panel weight would be about 80% of the above-mentioned ⅝inch thick panel weight. Similarly, for panels with comparable densitiesand dimensions but with a nominal ¾ inch thickness, the panel weightsmay be about 120% of the above mentioned ⅝ inch thick panels.

In embodiments where the set gypsum core has a density of from about 30pcf to about 40 pcf, the core of ⅝ inch thick panels can be formed fromslurry formulations comprising stucco in an amount from about 1162lbs/msf to about 1565 lbs/msf; high expansion vermiculate from about 5%to about 10% by weight of the stucco, starch from about 0.3% to about 3%by weight of the stucco; mineral or glass fiber from about 0.3% to about0.5% by weight of the stucco, and phosphate from about 0.03% to about0.4% by weight of the stucco. As mentioned below, other conventionaladditives can be employed in the practice of principles of the presentdisclosure in customary amounts to impart desirable properties, tofacilitate manufacturing and to obtain the desired core density. Inother embodiments, gypsum core of ⅝ inch thick panels formed accordingto principles of the present disclosure can have a density of from about32 to about 38 pounds per cubic foot and a gypsum core weight from about1500 to about 1700 lb/msf. In some of such embodiments, the gypsum corealso comprises about 5.5% to about 8% high expansion vermiculate; about0.5% to about 2.5% starch; about 0.4%, to about 0.7% mineral or glassfiber; and about 0.07% to about 0.25% phosphate. As mentioned above,each component of the gypsum core, such as the starch, fiber, andphosphate, may be further adjusted to provide desired panel properties,and in view of the composition and weight of the cover sheets, thenature and amount of other additives to the panel core, and the qualityof the gypsum stucco.

In the exemplary embodiments mentioned in Table I in FIG. 19, thecombination of stucco, high expansion particulates in the form of highexpansion vermiculite, and the other noted ingredients provide reducedweight gypsum panels with desired fire resistance, and also providespanels that satisfy desired nail-pull resistance, and sound transmissionproperties. This combination of ingredients (and others within the scopeof the invention) makes it possible to produce such high performing,reduced weight, fire resistant gypsum panels with the x-y area shrinkresistance and z-direction expansion properties comparable to, if notbetter than, much heavier, denser gypsum panels. In embodiments such asthose set forth in Table I in FIG. 19, the High Temperature Shrinkage ofthe panels typically is less than about 10% in the x-y directions(width-length) and High Temperature Thickness Expansion of the panelthickness in the z-direction (thickness) is typically greater than about20% at about 1560° F. (850° C.) as discussed in Example 4B below. Insome embodiments, the ratio of z-direction High Temperature ThicknessExpansion to x-y High Temperature Shrinkage is at least about 2 to overabout 17 at 1570° F. (855° C.) as also discussed in Example 4B.

Another measure of heat resistance is discussed in Example 3 below. Inthat testing, shrink resistance at temperatures in excess of about 1800°F. (980° C.) was evaluated. Using panels formed according to principlesof the present disclosure, such as those set forth in Table I in FIG.19, the reduced weight and density gypsum panels demonstrated a shrinkresistance of greater than about 85% in the x-y directions. Valuesexpressed in Table I as lb/msf are for nominally ⅝ inch thick panels.

Other conventional additives can be employed in the practice ofprinciples of the present disclosure in customary amounts to impartdesirable properties and to facilitate manufacturing. Examples of suchadditives are aqueous foams, set accelerators, set retarders,dehydration inhibitors, binders, adhesives, dispersing aids, leveling ornon-leveling agents, thickeners, bactericides, fungicides, pH adjusters,colorants, water repellants, fillers and mixtures thereof. In someembodiments, gypsum panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure may incorporate inorganic material such as clay, colloidalsilica, or colloidal alumina in its gypsum core. In most of suchembodiments, such inorganic materials are not in amounts which wouldsubstantially affect the shrink resistance of the gypsum panels underhigh temperature conditions.

In some embodiments utilizing one or more formulations within thosedisclosed in Table I in FIG. 19, panels, and methods for making thesame, are provided which are configured as reduced weight and density, ⅝inch thick gypsum panels that will meet or exceed a “one hour” firerating pursuant to the fire containment and structural integrityrequirements of the UL U305, U419, U423, and/or equivalent fire testprocedures and standards. In yet other embodiments using theformulations of Table I, the present disclosure provides reduced weightand density, ½ inch thick gypsum panels, and methods for making thesame, that are capable of satisfying at least a ¾ hour fire ratingpursuant to the fire containment and structural integrity procedures andstandards U419. Similar results may be achieved utilizing otherformulations consistent with principles described herein.

The combination of reduced weight, fire resistance, and theabove-referenced strength and structural characteristics is due, it isbelieved, to the unexpected results from various combinations of theabove components. Components useful in calcined gypsum slurryformulations following principles of the present disclosure arediscussed in greater detail below.

Stuccos—

The stucco (or calcined gypsum) component used to form the crystallinematrix of the gypsum panel core typically comprises beta calcium sulfatehemihydrate, water-soluble calcium sulfate anhydrite, alpha calciumsulfate hemihydrate, or mixtures of any or all of these, from natural orsynthetic sources. In some embodiments, the stucco may includenon-gypsum minerals, such as minor amounts of clays or other componentsthat are associated with the gypsum source or are added during thecalcination, processing and/or delivery of the stucco to the mixer.

By way of example, the amounts of stucco referenced in Table I in FIG.19 assume that the gypsum source has at least about a 95% purity.Accordingly, the components, and their relative amounts, such as thosementioned in Table I above, used to form the core slurry may be variedor modified depending on the stucco source, purity and content. Forexample, the composition of the gypsum core slurry and the amount ofhigh expansion vermiculite used may be modified for different stuccocompositions depending on the gypsum purity, the natural or syntheticsource for the gypsum, the stucco water content, the stucco claycontent, etc.

High Expansion Particulates—

Reduced weight and density gypsum panels formed according to principlesof the present disclosure can achieve unique and unexpected results interms of resistance to fire and the associated extreme heat conditions,without relying on increased quantities of gypsum hemihydrates typicalof conventional fire rated gypsum panels or relying predominantly onconventional, relatively low expansion vermiculite, such as thatreferred to as “Grade No. 5” unexpanded vermiculite (with a typicalparticle size of less than about 0.0157 inches (0.40 mm)). As mentionedabove, panels formed according to principles of the present disclosurecan utilize high expansion particulates in the form of vermiculite witha high volume of expansion relative to Grade No. 5 vermiculite (U.S.grading system) and other low expansion vermiculites which have beenused in commercial fire rated gypsum panels.

The vermiculites referred to herein as “high expansion vermiculite” havea volume expansion after heating for one hour at about 1560° F. (about850° C.) of about 300% or more of their original volume. In contrast,Grade No. 5 unexpanded vermiculite typically has a volume expansion atabout 1560° F. (about 850° C.) of about 225%. Other particulates withproperties comparable to high expansion vermiculite also may be utilizedin embodiments of panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure, as well. In some embodiments, high expansion vermiculitescan be used that have a volume expansion of about 300% to about 380% oftheir original volume after being placed for one hour in a chamberhaving a temperature of about 1560° F. (about 850° C.).

One such high expansion vermiculite is often referred to as Grade No. 4unexpanded vermiculite (U.S. grading system) (such high expansionvermiculites were rejected as a useful ingredient in fire rated gypsumwallboard in U.S. Pat. No. 3,454,456 discussed above). In someembodiments, at least about 50% of the particles in the high expansionvermiculite used in panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure will be larger than about 50 mesh (i.e. greater than about0.0117 inch (0.297 mm) openings). In other embodiments, at least about70% of the particles will be larger than about 70 mesh (i.e. larger thanabout 0.0083 inch (0.210 mm) openings).

In other embodiments, high expansion vermiculites can be used that areclassified under different and/or foreign grading systems. Such highexpansion vermiculites should have substantially similar expansionand/or thermal resistance characteristics typical of those discussedherein. For example, in some embodiments, a vermiculite classified asEuropean, South American, or South African Grade 0 (micron) or Grade 1(superfine) can be used.

In some embodiments, a high expansion vermiculite can be used whichincludes particle distribution in which up to about 50% of thevermiculite particles are less than about 500 micrometers, up to about60% of the vermiculite particles are between about 500 micrometers andabout 1000 micrometers, up to about 40% of the vermiculite particles arebetween about 1000 micrometers and about 1500 micrometers, and up toabout 20% of the vermiculite particles are between about 1500micrometers and about 3000 micrometers. In some embodiments, a highexpansion vermiculite can include vermiculite particles according to thefollowing distribution: between about 25% and about 45% of the particlesare less than about 500 micrometers, between about 40% and 60% of theparticles are between about 500 micrometers and about 1000 micrometers,up to about 20% of the particles are between about 1000 micrometers andabout 1500 micrometers, and up to about 10% of the particles are betweenabout 1500 micrometers and about 3000 micrometers. In yet otherembodiments, a high expansion vermiculite can include vermiculiteparticles according to the following distribution: between about 5% andabout 20% of the particles are less than about 500 micrometers, betweenabout 35% and 60% of the particles are between about 500 micrometers andabout 1000 micrometers, between about 20% and about 40% of the particlesare between about 1000 micrometers and about 1500 micrometers, and up toabout 20% of the particles are between about 1500 micrometers and about3000 micrometers.

In yet other embodiments, vermiculites that have been chemically treatedor otherwise modified such that they exhibit volume expansion behaviorunder heating similar to the high expansion vermiculites discussedherein also may be used. The high expansion vermiculate useful in panelsformed according to principles of the present disclosure can alsoinclude other vermiculites, vermiculite mixes and/or vermiculitecontaining compositions (and other particle sizes and sizedistributions), as well as other particulate materials with comparableexpansion properties that provide the panel shrinkage and expansioncharacteristics typical of the panels disclosed herein. Other suitablehigh expansion vermiculites and other particulates also may differ fromthose disclosed herein in respects that are not material to providingthe reduced weight and density, fire resistant gypsum panels disclosedherein.

In some embodiments, high expansion vermiculite used in the reducedweight and density, fire resistant gypsum panels formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure can include commercial U.S. grade 4vermiculite commercially-available through a variety of sources. Each ofthe commercial producers can provide specifications for physicalproperties of the high expansion vermiculite, such as Mohs hardness,total moisture, free moisture, bulk density, specific ratio, aspectratio, cation exchange capacity, solubility, pH (in distilled water),expansion ratio, expansion temperature, and melting point, for example.It is contemplated that in different embodiments using different sourcesof high expansion vermiculites, these physical properties will vary.

In some embodiments, the high expansion vermiculate particles aregenerally distributed throughout the core portion of the gypsum panels.In other embodiments, the high expansion vermiculite particles aregenerally evenly distributed throughout the core portion of the gypsumpanels.

The high expansion vermiculite can be generally randomly distributedthroughout the reduced density portions of the panel core. In someembodiments, it may be desirable to have a different vermiculitedistribution in the denser portions of a panel, such as in the abovementioned increased density gypsum layer adjacent the panel face(s) orin portions of the core with greater density along the panel edges. Inother embodiments, the high expansion vermiculite may be substantiallyexcluded from those denser portions of the panels, such as hardenededges and faces of the panels. Such variations in vermiculite particlecontents and distribution in the denser portions of the panels may be asa result of drawing core slurry from the core slurry mixer for use inthose portions of the panel, by introduction of the vermiculite throughother appropriate means into the slurry for the reduced density coreportions of the panel, by using edge mixers, or other means known tothose skilled in the art.

There further may be considerable variation in the amount of highexpansion particles distributed throughout the core, and in the specificdistribution of the particles in some embodiments of panels formedaccording to principles of the present disclosure relative to thedistribution of particles in other panels so formed. Such variations inamount and distribution of the high expansion particles will depend onthe amount and type of the vermiculite or other particles incorporatedin the slurry, the high expansion particle size and size distribution,the core slurry composition, and the core slurry mixing and distributionprocedures, among other factors. Similarly, the distribution of thespecific particles, particle properties and particle sizes within thecore may vary and can depend on similar factors during the mixing anddistribution of the core slurry during the panel forming process.

In some embodiments, the high expansion particle distribution avoidsinstances of large concentrations of the high expansion particles inportions of the panel core that significantly reduce the structuralstrength and integrity of the core during normal use of the panels orduring high temperature and/or fire conditions. This would not includeminor variations encountered in typical commercial production. The highexpansion particle distribution also can be modified in terms of theconcentration of the particles in one or more portions of the core forspecific desired applications of the panels.

In some embodiments, the above mentioned distribution of the highexpansion particles in the reduced density core of the panels occursduring the mixing of the core slurry, passage of the slurry to the firstcoversheet and/or the distribution of the slurry across the cover sheet.In some embodiments, the high expansion particles can be added to thecore slurry mixer with other dry or semi-dry materials during the mixingand preparation of the core slurry. Alternatively, in other embodiments,high expansion particles can be added in other procedures, steps orstages which generally distribute the high expansion particles withinthe desired portions of the panel gypsum core.

As reflected in FIGS. 1-6, further discussed below, the vermiculiteparticles frequently are distributed near or adjacent the voids formedin the reduced density portions of the gypsum core, as well as incrystalline portions of the core that one of ordinary skill would expectto contribute to the structural strength of the core. Such adistribution in a reduced density crystalline core structure (whichitself is considered relatively fragile), would lead one of ordinaryskill to believe that significant expansion of the vermiculite particleswould disrupt the core and cause the spalling, core fractures and corefailures known to those of ordinary skill and discussed in thereferences discussed above. This would be particularly true inembodiments of a gypsum panel formed according to principles of thepresent disclosure where the panel core has a relatively low density,and thus a relatively high void volume, and significantly reducedcrystalline gypsum content. The reduction of the core crystalline gypsumcontent would be expected to reduce the structural strength and heatsink capability of gypsum panels. As further discussed below, thissurprisingly was not the case for panels formed according to principlesof the present disclosure.

Starches—

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, embodiments of thecore slurry formulation for use in preparing panels formed in accordancewith principles of the present disclosure can comprise a starch. In someembodiments of panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure, and the methods for preparing such panels, the core slurryformulation, such as mentioned in Table I in FIG. 19, includes apregelatinized starch or a functionally-equivalent starch. Raw starchcan be pregelatinized by cooking the starch in water at temperatures ofat least 185° F. or by other well known methods for causing gelformation in the starch utilized in the panel core. The starch may beincorporated in the core slurry in a dry form, a predispersed liquidform, or combinations of both. In a dry form, a starch may be added tothe core slurry mixer with other dry ingredients or in a separateaddition procedure, step or stage. In the predispersed form, it may beadded with other liquid ingredients, such as gauging water, for example,or in a separate addition procedure, step or stage.

Some examples of readily available pregelatinized starches that may beused in the practice of the present disclosure are commerciallyavailable pre-gelled yellow corn flour starch from Cargill, Inc. or fromArcher Daniels Midland Co. In some embodiments, the starch componentincludes at least pregelatinized corn starch, such as pregelatinizedcorn flour available from Bunge Milling, St. Louis, Mo. Suchpregelatinized starches have the following typical characteristics:moisture about 7.5%, protein about 8.0%, oil about 0.5%, crude fiberabout 0.5%, ash about 0.3%; having a green strength of about 0.48 psi;and having a bulk density of about 35 lb/ft³. In yet other embodiments,the core slurry formulation can include one or more commerciallyavailable hydroxyethylated starches suitable for the purposes of thepresent disclosure.

In other embodiments, other useful starches can be used, includingacid-modified starches, such as acid-modified corn flour available asHI-BOND from Bunge Milling, St. Louis, Mo. This starch has the followingtypical characteristics: moisture about 10.0%, oil about 1.4%, coldwater solubles about 17.0%, alkaline fluidity about 98.0%, bulk densityabout 30 lb/ft′, and about a 20% slurry producing a pH of about 4.3.Another useful starch is non-pregelatinized wheat starch, such asECOSOL-45, available from ADM/Ogilvie, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Fibers—

In some embodiments incorporating fibers such as mentioned in Table I inFIG. 19, and the methods for preparing such panels, the fibers mayinclude mineral fibers, carbon and/or glass fibers and mixtures of suchfibers, as well as other comparable fibers providing comparable benefitsto the panel. In some embodiments, glass fibers are incorporated in thegypsum core slurry and resulting crystalline core structure. The glassfibers in some of such embodiments can have an average length of about0.5 to about 0.75 inches and a diameter of about 11 to about 17 microns.In other embodiments, such glass fibers may have an average length ofabout 0.5 to about 0.675 inches and a diameter of about 13 to about 16microns. In yet other embodiments, E-glass fibers are utilized having asoftening point above about 800° C. and one such fiber type is Advantex®glass fibers (available from Owens Corning) having a softening pointabove at least about 900° C. Mineral wool or carbon fibers such as thoseknow to those of ordinary skill may be used in place of or incombination with glass fibers, such as those mentioned above.

Phosphates—

In some embodiments of panels formed according to principles of thepresent disclosure and the methods for preparing such panels, aphosphate salt or other source of phosphate ions such as mentioned inTable I in FIG. 19 is added to the gypsum slurry used to produce thepanel gypsum core. The use of such phosphates can contribute toproviding a gypsum core with increased strength, resistance to permanentdeformation (e.g., sag resistance), and dimensional stability, comparedwith set gypsum formed from a mixture containing no phosphate. In someof such embodiments, the phosphate source is added in amounts to providedimensional stability, or wet strength, to the panel and panel corewhile the gypsum hemihydrate in the core hydrates and forms the gypsumdihydrate crystalline core structure (for example during the timebetween the forming plate and the kiln section of the formationprocess). Additionally, it is noted that to the extent that the addedphosphate acts as a retarder, an appropriate accelerator can be added atthe required level to overcome any adverse retarding effects of thephosphate. The phosphates usually are added in a dry form and/or aliquid form, with the dry ingredients typically added to the core slurrymixer and the liquid ingredients added to the mixer or in other stagesor procedures.

Phosphate-containing components useful in the present disclosure includewater-soluble components and can be in the form of an ion, a salt, or anacid, namely, condensed phosphoric acids, each of which comprises two ormore phosphoric acid units; salts or ions of condensed phosphates, eachof which comprises two or more phosphate units; and monobasic salts ormonovalent ions of orthophosphates, such as described, for example, inU.S. Pat. Nos. 6,342,284; 6,632,550; and 6,815,049, the disclosures ofall of which are incorporated herein by reference. Suitable examples ofsuch classes of phosphates will be apparent to those skilled in the art.For example, any suitable monobasic orthophosphate-containing compoundcan be utilized in the practice of principles of the present disclosure,including, but not limited to, monoammonium phosphate, monosodiumphosphate, monopotassium phosphate, and combinations thereof. Apreferred monobasic phosphate salt is monopotassium phosphate.

Similarly, any suitable water-soluble polyphosphate salt can be used inaccordance with the present disclosure. The polyphosphate can be cyclicor acyclic. Exemplary cyclic polyphosphates include, for example,trimetaphosphate salts and tetrametaphosphate salts. Thetrimetaphosphate salt can be selected, for example, from sodiumtrimetaphosphate (also referred to herein as STMP), potassiumtrimetaphosphate, lithium trimetaphosphate, ammonium trimetaphosphate,and the like, or combinations thereof.

Also, any suitable water-soluble acyclic polyphosphate salt can beutilized in accordance with the present disclosure. The acyclicpolyphosphate salt has at least two phosphate units. By way of example,suitable acyclic polyphosphate salts in accordance with the presentdisclosure include, but are not limited to, pyrophosphates,tripolyphosphates, sodium hexametaphosphate having from about six toabout 27 repeating phosphate units, potassium hexametaphosphate havingfrom about six to about 27 repeating phosphate units, ammoniumhexametaphosphate having from about six to about 27 repeating phosphateunits, and combinations thereof. A preferred acyclic polyphosphate saltpursuant to the present disclosure is commercially available as CALGON®from ICL Performance Products LP, St. Louis, Mo., which is a sodiumhexametaphosphate having from about six to about 27 repeating phosphateunits.

Preferably, the phosphate-containing compound is selected from the groupconsisting of sodium trimetaphosphate having the molecular formula(NaPO₃)₃, sodium hexametaphosphate having from about six to about 27repeating phosphate units and having the molecular formulaNa_(n+2)P_(n)O_(3n+1) wherein n=6-27, tetrapotassium pyrophosphatehaving the molecular formula K₄P₂O₇, trisodium dipotassiumtripolyphosphate having the molecular formula Na₃K₂P₃O₁₀, sodiumtripolyphosphate having the molecular formula Na₅P₃O₁₀, tetrasodiumpyrophosphate having the molecular formula Na₄P₂O₇, aluminumtrimetaphosphate having the molecular formula Al(PO₃)₃, sodium acidpyrophosphate having the molecular formula Na₂H₂P₂O₇, ammoniumpolyphosphate having 1000-3000 repeating phosphate units and having themolecular formula (NH₄)_(n+2)P_(n)O_(3n+1) wherein n=1000-3000, orpolyphosphoric acid having two or more repeating phosphoric acid unitsand having the molecular formula H_(n+2)P_(n)O_(3n+1) wherein n is twoor more. Sodium trimetaphosphate is most preferred and is commerciallyavailable from ICL Performance Products LP, St. Louis, Mo.

Dispersants—

In other embodiments of reduced weight and density, fire resistantpanels formed according to principles of the present disclosure, and themethods for preparing such panels, dispersants such as those mentionedin Table I in FIG. 19, can be included in the gypsum core slurry. Thedispersants may be added in a dry form with other dry ingredients and/ora liquid form with other liquid ingredients in the core slurry mixer orin other steps or procedures.

In some embodiments, such dispersants can include naphthalenesulfonates,such as polynaphthalenesulfonic acid and its salts(polynaphthalenesulfonates) and derivatives, which are condensationproducts of naphthalenesulfonic acids and formaldehyde. Such desirablepolynaphthalenesulfonates include sodium and calciumnaphthalenesulfonate. The average molecular weight of thenaphthalenesulfonates can range from about 3,000 to 27,000, although itis preferred that the molecular weight be about 8,000 to 10,000. At agiven solids percentage aqueous solution, a higher molecular weightdispersant has a higher viscosity, and generates a higher water demandin the formulation, than a lower molecular weight dispersant.

Useful naphthalenesulfonates include DILOFLO, available from GEOSpecialty Chemicals, Cleveland, Ohio; DAXAD, available from HampshireChemical Corp., Lexington, Mass.; and LOMAR D, available from GEOSpecialty Chemicals, Lafayette, Ind.

The naphthalenesulfonates are preferably used as aqueous solutions inthe range of about 35% to about 55% by weight solids content, forexample. It is most preferred to use the naphthalenesulfonates in theform of an aqueous solution, for example, in the range of about 40% toabout 45% by weight solids content. Alternatively, where appropriate,the naphthalenesulfonates can be used in dry solid or powder form, suchas LOMAR D, for example.

Alternatively, in other embodiments, dispersants known to those skilledin the art useful for improving fluidity in gypsum slurries may be usedemployed, such as polycarboxylate dispersants. A number ofpolycarboxylate dispersants, particularly polycarboxylic ethers, arepreferred types of dispersants. One preferred class of dispersants usedin the slurry includes two repeating units and is described further inU.S. Pat. No. 7,767,019, which is entitled, “Gypsum Products Utilizing aTwo-Repeating Unit System and Process for Making Them,” and isincorporated herein by reference. Examples of these dispersants areproducts of BASF Construction Polymers, GmbH (Trostberg, Germany) andsupplied by BASF Construction Polymers, Inc. (Kennesaw, Ga.) (hereafter“BASF”) and are hereafter referenced as the “PCE211-Type Dispersants.” Aparticularly useful dispersant of the PCE211-Type Dispersants isdesignated PCE211 (hereafter “211”). Other polymers in this seriesuseful in the present disclosure include PCE111. PCE211-Type dispersantsare described more fully in U.S. Ser. No. 11/827,722 (Pub. No. US2007/0255032A1), filed Jul. 13, 2007 and entitled, “Polyether-ContainingCopolymer,” which is incorporated herein by reference.

The molecular weight of one type of such PCE211 Type dispersants may befrom about 20,000 to about 60,000 Daltons. It has been found that thelower molecular weight dispersants cause less retardation of set timethan dispersants having a molecular weight greater than 60,000 Daltons.Generally longer side chain length, which results in an increase inoverall molecular weight, provides better dispensability. However, testswith gypsum indicate that efficacy of the dispersant is reduced atmolecular weights above 50,000 Daltons.

Another class of polycarboxylate compounds that are useful asdispersants in this disclosure is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,777,517,which is incorporated herein by reference and hereafter referenced asthe “2641-Type Dispersant.” Examples of PCE211-Type and 2641-Typedispersants are manufactured by BASF Construction Polymers, GmbH(Trostberg, Germany) and marketed in the United States by BASFConstruction Polymers, Inc. (Kennesaw, Ga.). Preferred 2641-TypeDispersants are sold by BASF as MELFLUX 2641F, MELFLUX 2651F and MELFLUX2500L dispersants.

Yet another preferred dispersant family is sold by BASF and referencedas “1641-Type Dispersants.” The 1641-Type dispersant is more fullydescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,798,425, which is incorporated herein byreference. One of such 1641-Type Dispersants is marketed as MELFLUX1641F dispersant by BASF. Other dispersants that can be used includeother polycarboxylate ethers such as COATEX Ethacryl M, available fromCoatex, Inc. of Chester, S.C., and lignosulfonates, or sulfonatedlignin. Lignosulfonates are water-soluble anionic polyelectrolytepolymers, byproducts from the production of wood pulp using sulfitepulping. One example of a lignin useful in the practice of principles ofthe present disclosure is Marasperse C-21 available from Reed LigninInc., Greenwich, Conn.

High Efficiency Heat Sink Additives (“HEHS Additives”)—

In some embodiments of panels formed according to principles of thepresent disclosure and the methods for preparing such panels, the panelcore may include one or more additives referred to herein as highefficiency heat sink additives (“HEHS additives”). Such additives have aheat sink capacity that exceeds the heat sink capacity of comparableamounts of gypsum dihydrate in the temperature range causing thedehydration and release of water vapor from the gypsum dihydratecomponent of the panel core. Such additives typically are selected fromcompositions, such as aluminum trihydrate or other metal hydroxides,that decompose, releasing water vapor in the same or similar temperatureranges as does gypsum dihydrate. While other HEHS additives (orcombinations of HEHS additives) with increased heat sink efficiencyrelative to comparable amounts of gypsum dihydrate can be used,preferred HEHS additives provide a sufficiently-increased heat sinkefficiency relative to gypsum dihydrate to offset any increase in weightor other undesired properties of the HEHS additives when used in agypsum panel intended for fire rated or other high temperatureapplications.

For example, in preferred embodiments, one or more HEHS additivesundergo an endothermic reaction to absorb heat when exposed tosignificant temperature increases. In some such embodiments, the heat ofdecomposition (which may be a dehydration reaction) per unit mass of theHEHS additive(s) consumes at least about 685 Joules/gram, in otherembodiments at least about 1000 Joules/gram, and in still otherembodiments consumes from about 1100 to about 1400 Joules/gram. In suchembodiments, the HEHS additive(s) can have a heat of decomposition perunit mass in the relevant temperature range that is significantly higherthan that of the gypsum dehydrate in the gypsum panel. Accordingly, theHEHS additive consumes more energy (Joules/gram) during heating thanconsumed by the dehydration of the gypsum dihydrate.

In some embodiments, the lowest decomposition temperature of the HEHSadditive(s) is about 40° C. or more. In other embodiments, thedecomposition temperatures of the HEHS additive(s) range from about 40°C. to about 1000° C.; in other embodiments, from about 150° C. to about450° C.; and in other embodiments, from about 150° C. to about 300° C.In yet another embodiment, the HEHS additive(s) begin endothermicthermal decomposition at about 150° C. and are substantially, orentirely, decomposed at a temperature of about 980° C., which is thetypical 1-hour endpoint temperature in the above mentioned ASTM-E119temperature curve used in the above mentioned fire tests.

As mentioned above, one preferred HEHS additive comprises aluminumtrihydrate (ATH) containing crystallized or otherwise bound or complexedwater. ATH typically is very stable at room temperature. Abovetemperatures between about 180° C. and 205° C., ATH typically undergoesan endothermic decomposition releasing water vapor. The heat ofdecomposition for such ATH additives is greater than about 1000Joule/gram, and in one preferred embodiment is about 1170 Joule/gram.Without being bound by theory, it is believed that the ATH additivedecomposes to release approximately 35% of the water of crystallizationas water vapor when heated above 205° C. as follows: AL(OH)₃→Al₂O₃-3H₂O.In embodiments using ATH as an HEHS additive, any suitable ATH can beused. In embodiments, ATH from commercial suppliers, such as, AkrochemCorp. of Akron, Ohio, can be used. Any suitable grade of ATH can beused. One example is ATH Grade No. SB-36. ATH Grade No. SB-36 can have amedian particle size of about 25 microns and a surface area of about 1m²/g. In other embodiments, other suitable grade of ATH having anysuitable median particle size and surface area can be used.

In other embodiments, the HEHS additive(s) may comprise magnesiumhydroxide. In these embodiments, the magnesium hydroxide HEHS additivepreferably has a heat of decomposition greater than about 1000Joules/gram, such as about 1350 Joules/gram, at or above 180° C. to 205°C. In such embodiments, any suitable magnesium hydroxide can be used,such as that commercially, available from commercial suppliers,including Akrochem Corp. of Akron, Ohio.

The increased heat sink capacity of the preferred HEHS additives may beutilized to increase thermal insulation properties of the gypsum panelsdisclosed herein relative to the panels formed without the HEHSadditive. The amount and composition of the HEHS additives incorporatedin the gypsum panels disclosed herein may vary depending on the desiredweight and density of the panels, the purity of the stucco used to formthe panels, the panel core formulation, the presence of other additivesand other similar considerations. Examples of preferred coreformulations for gypsum panels incorporating preferred HEHS additivesare summarized in Table I in FIG. 19. The HEHS additive can be added ina dry form and/or a liquid form, with the dry ingredients typicallyadded to the core slurry mixer and the liquid ingredients added to themixer or in other stages or procedures.

In one such preferred embodiment, the panel core incorporates an HEHSadditive such as aluminum trihydrate in an amount from about 2% to about5% by weight of the stucco in some embodiments, from about 2% to about7% by weight of the stucco in other embodiments, and in amounts up toabout 10% by weight of the stucco in still other preferred embodiments.In some of such preferred embodiments, the incorporation of the HEHSadditive in the core formulation allows for the reduction of the stuccocontent of the formulation to reduce the weight and density of the panelcore. In one example of the use of the HEHS additive, the ratio of HEHSadditive to removed stucco on a weight basis is about 1 to about 2. Inone such example, in other words, about 40-50 lbs/msf of the HEHSadditive may be incorporated in the core formulation and about 80-100lbs/msf of stucco may be removed from the formulation. Accordingly, aweight savings of about 40-50 lbs/msf may be achieved in this examplewithout a substantial change in the thermal insulation properties of thepanel.

The ratio of HEHS additive to stucco removed from a core formulation canbe varied depending on the HEHS additive used, its heat sink properties,the heat sink properties of the specific stucco, the formulation of thegypsum core, the desired thermal insulation properties of the panel, thedesired weight reduction and physical properties of the panel andrelated concerns. In some preferred embodiments using aluminumtrihydrate, the ratio of HEHS additive to removed stucco may be about2:1 in some embodiments, in other embodiments about 3:1, and in stillother embodiments about 4:1. The ratio of HEHS additive(s) to removedstucco may be different for different HEHS additive compositions andapplications.

Retarders/Accelerators—

Set retarders (up to about 2 lb/MSF (approx. 9.8 g/m²) in ⅝ inch thickpanels) or dry accelerators (up to about 35 lb/MSF (approx. 170 g/m²) in⅝ inch thick panels) may be added to some embodiments of the core slurryto modify the rate at which the stucco hydration reactions take place.“CSA” is an example of a preferred set accelerator including about 95%calcium sulfate dihydrate co-ground with about 5% sugar and heated to250° F. (1-21° C.) to caramelize the sugar. CSA is available from USGCorporation, Southard, Okla. plant, and can be made according to U.S.Pat. No. 3,573,947, which is incorporated herein by reference. Potassiumsulfate is another example of a preferred accelerator. “HRA,” which isanother exemplary preferred accelerator, is calcium sulfate dihydratefreshly ground with sugar at a ratio of about 5 to about 25 pounds ofsugar per 100 pounds of calcium sulfate dihydrate. HRA is furtherdescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,078,199, which is incorporated herein byreference.

Another accelerator known as wet gypsum accelerator, or “WGA,” is also apreferred accelerator. A description of the use of, and a method formaking, wet gypsum accelerator is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,409,825,which is incorporated herein by reference. This accelerator includes atleast one additive selected from the group consisting of an organicphosphonic compound, a phosphate-containing compound or mixturesthereof. This particular accelerator exhibits substantial longevity andmaintains its effectiveness over time such that the wet gypsumaccelerator can be made, stored, and even transported over longdistances prior to use. The wet gypsum accelerator can be used inamounts ranging from about 5 to about 80 pounds per thousand square feet(approx. 24.3 to 390 g/m²) of ⅝ inch thick wallboard product.

Foams—

Foam can be introduced into the core slurry in amounts that provide theabove-mentioned reduced core density and panel weight. The introductionof foam in the core slurry in the proper amounts, formulations andprocesses can produce a desired network and distribution of air voids,and walls between the air voids, within the core of the final driedpanels. In some embodiments, the air void sizes, distributions and/orwall thickness between air voids provided by the foam composition andfoam introduction system are in accordance with those discussed below,as well as those that provide comparable density, strength and relatedproperties to the panels. This air void structure permits the reductionof the gypsum and other core constituents and the core density andweight, while substantially maintaining (or in some instances improving)the panel strength properties, such as core compressive strength, andthe panel rigidity, flexural strength, nail pull resistance, amongothers.

In some embodiments, at a nominal panel thickness of about ⅝-inch, agypsum panel formed according to principles of the present disclosure,and the methods for making same, provide a panel that has a nail pullresistance, determined according to ASTM standard C473-09, of at leastabout 70 lb. In other embodiments, the panel can have a nail pullresistance, determined according to ASTM standard C473-09, of at leastabout 85 lb.

In some such embodiments, the mean equivalent sphere diameter of the airvoids can be at least about 75 μm, and in other embodiments at leastabout 100 μm. In other embodiments, the mean equivalent sphere diameterof the air voids can be from about 75 μm to about 400 μm. In yet otherembodiments, the mean equivalent sphere diameter of the air voids can befrom about 100 μm to about 350 μm with a standard deviation from about100 to about 225. In other embodiments, the mean equivalent spherediameter of the air voids may be from about 125 μm to about 325 μm witha standard deviation from about 100 to about 200.

In some embodiments, from about 15% to about 70% of the air voids havean equivalent sphere diameter of about 150 μm or less. In otherembodiments, from about 45% to about 95% of the air voids have anequivalent sphere diameter of about 300 μm or less, and from about 5% toabout 55% of the air voids have an equivalent sphere diameter of about300 μm or more. In other embodiments, from about 45% to about 95% of theair voids have an equivalent sphere diameter of about 300 μm or less,and from about 5% to about 55% of the air voids have an equivalentsphere diameter from about 300 μm to about 600 μm. In the discussion ofaverage air void sizes herein, voids in the gypsum core that are about 5μm or less are not considered when calculating the number of air voidsor the average air void size.

In those and other embodiments, the thickness, distribution andarrangement of the walls between the voids in such embodiments, aloneand/or in combination with a desired air void size distribution andarrangement, also permit a reduction in the panel core density andweight, while substantially maintaining (or in some instances improving)the panel strength properties. In some such embodiments, the averagethickness of the walls separating the air voids may be at least about 25μm. In some embodiments, the walls defining and separating air voidswithin the gypsum core may have an average thickness from about 25 μm toabout 200 μm, from about 25 μm to about 75 μm in other embodiments, andfrom about 25 μm to about 50 μm in still other embodiments. In yet otherembodiments, the walls defining and separating air voids within thegypsum core may have an average thickness from about 25 μm to about 75μm with a standard deviation from about 5 to about 40. In yet otherembodiments, the walls defining and separating air voids within thegypsum core may have an average thickness from about 25 μm to about 50μm with a standard deviation from about 10 to about 25.

Without being bound by theory, it is believed that embodiments with theabove discussed air void size distributions and arrangements, and wallthicknesses and distributions, assist in improving the panel's hightemperature properties when used with the high expansion vermiculitedisclosed herein. It is believed that the foam void and wall thicknessassist in reducing or substantially resist the creation of substantialfaults in the gypsum core structure when the high expansion vermiculiteexpands at high temperature conditions.

Examples of the use of foaming agents to produce desired void and wallstructures include those discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,643,510, thedisclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. In someembodiments, a combination of a first more stable foaming agent and asecond less stable foaming agent can be used in the core slurry mixture.In other embodiments, only one type of foaming agent is used, so long asthe desired density and panel strength requirements are satisfied. Theapproaches for adding foam to a core slurry are known in the art andexamples of such an approach is discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,643,510and 5,683,635, the disclosures of which are incorporated by referenceherein.

Cover Sheets—

In some embodiments of a panel formed according to principles of thepresent disclosure, the first cover sheet comprises low porosity manilapaper upon which the gypsum slurry is dispensed (which typically isexposed face of the board when used in a construction application).Newsline paper may be used as the second cover sheet placed on thegypsum core slurry during the forming process (which typically is theconcealed back surface of the panels when used in constructionapplications). In other applications, unwoven fiberglass mats, sheetmaterials of other fibrous or non-fibrous materials, or combinations ofpaper and other fibrous materials may be used as one or both of thecover sheets. As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, in otherembodiments, other cover sheets can be used which are suitable for theintended purpose of the panel.

In embodiments using paper or similar cover sheets, the first coversheet can be a higher density and basis weight than the secondcoversheet. For example, in some embodiments, the first cover sheet mayhave a basis weight of about 55 to about 65 lb/msf, and the secondcoversheet may have a basis weight of about 35 to about 45 lb/msf. Inyet other embodiments, different kinds of paper cover sheets, havingdifferent weights, and comprising different materials for example, canbe used. Similarly, in some embodiments, the cover sheets mayincorporate and may have added to their exposed surfaces, coatings ofmaterials providing surfaces suitable for specific constructionapplications such as exterior sheathing, roofing, tile backing, etc.

Siloxanes—

In some embodiments, the water resistance of gypsum panels formedaccording to principles of the present disclosure can be improved byadding a polymerizable siloxane to the slurry used to make the panels.Preferably, the siloxane is added in the form of an emulsion. The slurryis then shaped and dried under conditions which promote thepolymerization of the siloxane to form a highly cross-linked siliconeresin. A catalyst which promotes the polymerization of the siloxane toform a highly cross-linked silicone resin can be added to the gypsumslurry.

Preferably, the siloxane is generally a fluid linear hydrogen-modifiedsiloxane, but can also be a cyclic hydrogen-modified siloxane. Suchsiloxanes are capable of forming highly cross-linked silicone resins.Such fluids are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art and arecommercially available and are described in the patent literature.Typically, the linear hydrogen modified siloxanes useful in the practiceof principles of the present disclosure comprise those having arepeating unit of the general formula:

wherein R represents a saturated or unsaturated mono-valent hydrocarbonradical. In preferred embodiments, R represents an alkyl group, and mostpreferably R is a methyl group. During polymerization, the terminalgroups can be removed by condensation and siloxane groups are linkedtogether to form the silicone resin. Cross-linking of the chains canalso occur. The resulting silicone resin imparts water resistance to thegypsum matrix as it forms.

Preferably, a solventless methyl hydrogen siloxane fluid sold under thename SILRES BS 94 by Wacker-Chemie GmbH (Munich, Germany) will be usedas the siloxane. The manufacturer indicates this product is a siloxanefluid containing no water or solvents. It is contemplated that about 0.3to about 1.0% of the BS 94 siloxane may be used, based on the weight ofthe dry ingredients. It is preferred to use from about 0.4% to about0.8% of the siloxane based on the dry stucco weight.

The siloxane can be formed into an emulsion or a stable suspension withwater. A number of siloxane emulsions are contemplated for use in thisslurry. Emulsions of siloxane in water are also available for purchase,but they may include emulsifying agents that tend to modify propertiesof the gypsum articles, such as the paper bond in gypsum panel products.Emulsions or stable suspensions prepared without the use of emulsifiersare therefore preferred. Preferably, the suspension will be formed insitu by mixing the siloxane fluid with water. The siloxane suspension ismaintained in a stable condition until used and remains well dispersedunder the conditions of the slurry. The siloxane suspension or emulsionis maintained in a well dispersed condition in the presence of theoptional additives, such as set accelerators, that may be present in theslurry. The siloxane suspension or emulsion is maintained so that itremains stable through the steps in which the gypsum panels are formedas well. Preferably, the suspension remains stable for more than 40minutes. More preferably, it remains stable for at least one hour. Inthe discussion and claims that follow, the term “emulsion” is intendedto include true emulsions and suspensions that are stable at least untilthe stucco is about 50% set.

The siloxane polymerization reaction proceeds slowly on its own,requiring that the panels be stored for a time sufficient to developwater-resistance prior to shipping. Catalysts are known to acceleratethe polymerization reaction, reducing or eliminating the time needed tostore gypsum panels as the water-resistance develops. Use of dead-burnedmagnesium oxide for siloxane polymerization is described in U.S. Pat.No. 7,892,472, entitled “Method of Making Water-Resistant Gypsum-BasedArticle,” which is incorporated herein by reference. Dead-burnedmagnesium oxide is water-insoluble and interacts less with othercomponents of the slurry. It accelerates curing of the siloxane and, insome cases, causes the siloxane to cure more completely. It iscommercially available with a consistent composition. A particularlypreferred source of dead-burned magnesium oxide is BAYMAG 96. It has aBET surface area of at least 0.3 m²/g. The loss on ignition is less thanabout 0.1% by weight. The magnesium oxide is preferably used in amountsof about 0.1% to about 0.5% based on the dry stucco weight.

There are at least three grades of magnesium oxide on the market,depending on the calcination temperature. “Dead-burned” magnesium oxideis calcined between 1500° C. and 2000° C., eliminating most, if not all,of the reactivity. MagChem P98-PV (Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties,Bethesda, Md.) is an example of a “dead-burned” magnesium oxide. BayMag96 (Baymag, Inc. of Calgary, Alberta, Canada) and MagChem 10 (MartinMarietta Magnesia Specialties, Bethesda, Md.) are examples of“hard-burned” magnesia. “Hard-burned” magnesium oxide is calcined attemperatures from 1000° C. to about 1500° C. It has a narrow range ofreactivity, a high density, and is normally used in application whereslow degradation or chemical reactivity is required, such as in animalfeed and fertilizer. The third grade is “light-burn” or “caustic”magnesia, produced by calcining at temperatures of about 700° C. toabout 1000° C. This type of magnesia is used in a wide range ofapplications, including plastics, rubber, paper and pulp processing,steel boiler additives, adhesives and acid neutralization. Examples oflight burned magnesia include BayMag 30, BayMag 40, and BayMag 30 (−325Mesh) (BayMag, Inc. of Calgary, Alberta, Canada).

As mentioned in U.S. Pat. No. 7,803,226, which is incorporated herein byreference, preferred catalysts are made of a mixture of magnesium oxideand Class C fly ash. When combined in this manner, any of the grades ofmagnesium oxide are useful. However, dead-burned and hard-burnedmagnesium oxides are preferred due to their reduced reactivity. Therelatively high reactivity of magnesium oxides, can lead to crackingreactions which can produce hydrogen. As the hydrogen is generated, theproduct expands, causing cracks where the stucco has set. Expansion alsocauses breakdown of molds into which the stucco is poured, resulting inloss of detail and deformation of the product in one or more dimensions.Preferably, BayMag 96, MagChem P98-PV and MagChem 10 are the preferredsources of magnesium oxide. Preferably, the magnesium oxide and fly ashare added to the stucco prior to their addition to the gauging water.Dry components such as these are often added to the stucco as it movesalong a conveyer to the mixer.

A preferred fly ash is a Class C fly ash. Class C hydraulic fly ash, orits equivalent, is the most preferred fly ash component. A typicalcomposition of a Class C fly ash is shown in Table I of U.S. Pat. No.7,803,226. High lime content fly ash, greater than about 20% lime byweight, which is obtained from the processing of certain coals. ASTMdesignation C-618, herein incorporated by reference, describes thecharacteristics of Class C fly ash. A preferred Class C fly ash issupplied by Bayou Ash Inc., Big Cajun, II, La. Preferably, fly ash isused in amounts of about 0.1% to about 5% based on the dry stuccoweight. More preferably, the fly ash is used in amounts of about 0.2% toabout 1.5% based on the dry stucco weight.

Catalysis of the siloxane results in faster and more completepolymerization and cross-linking of siloxane to form the silicone resin.Hydration of the stucco forms an interlocking matrix of calcium sulfatedihydrate crystals. While the gypsum matrix is forming, the siloxanemolecules are also forming a silicone resin matrix. Since these areformed simultaneously, at least in part, the two matrices becomeintertwined in each other. Excess water and additives to the slurry,including the fly ash, magnesium oxide and additives described below,which were dispersed throughout the slurry, become dispersed throughoutthe matrices in the interstitial spaces to achieve water resistancethroughout the panel core. In some embodiments, suitable amounts of apregelatinized starch, or functionally-equivalent starch, can work inconjunction with the siloxane to retard water entry along the morevulnerable edges of the panel.

In some embodiments, embodiments of the core slurry formulation for usein preparing panels formed in accordance with principles of the presentdisclosure can comprise a combination of pregelatinized starch (orfunctionally-equivalent starch) in an amount greater than about 2% byweight based on the weight of stucco and siloxane in an amount of atleast about 0.4%, and preferably at least about 0.7% by weight based onthe weight of stucco, which can produce gypsum panels with less thanabout 5% water absorption. This water resistance property can beparticularly helpful since a reduced-density panel has far more of itstotal volume comprising air and/or water voids than a conventionalpanel. The increased void volume would be expected to make the lightweight panels far more water absorbent. While not wishing to be bound bytheory, it is believed that water resistance develops when the siloxanecures within the formed panels and that the at least about 2.0% byweight pregelatinized starch works in conjunction with the siloxane toslow water entry through micropores on the panel edges first by blockingwater entry and then, upon take-up of water by the starch by forming ahighly viscous starch/water combination. In other embodiments, ahydroxyethylated starch or a starch that is functionally equivalent to apregelatinized starch can be used in combination with the siloxane.

Referring to FIGS. 7 and 8, there is shown an exemplary embodiment of anassembly 100 that includes gypsum panels 102 formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure. The gypsum panels 102 are appliedto both opposing surfaces 104, 105 of the assembly 100. The assembly 100is representative of an assembly constructed according to UnderwritersLaboratories UL U305, U419, and U423 specifications and any other firetest procedure that is equivalent to any one of those fire testprocedures. It should be understood that reference made herein to aparticular fire test procedure of Underwriters Laboratories, such as, ULU305, U419, and U423, for example, also includes a fire test procedure,such as one promulgated by any other entity, that is equivalent to theparticular UL standard in question.

The assembly 100 includes wood studs 110 that are nominally 2 in. thickby 4 in. wide and spaced 16 in. on-center apart from each other. Theassembly also includes a pair of sill plates 112 and a top plate 114made from nominal 2 in. by 4 in. wood. In some embodiments, the woodstuds 110 and plates 112, 114 can be number two grade, kiln-dried woodstuds. The assembly 100 is effectively fire stopped with appropriateblocking 116 disposed between the studs 110. It should be understoodthat, although the exemplary assembly 100 includes wood studs 110, theassembly can include metal studs and loading parameters to conform tothe particular specification according to which it is constructed.

The gypsum panels 102 in the assembly 100 are ⅝ in. thick and includepaper cover sheets with tapered edges and square ends. The gypsum panels102 are applied horizontally to the studs 110 with the horizontal joints122 between adjacent gypsum panels 102 aligned on the opposing surfaces104, 105 of the assembly 100.

In other embodiments, the gypsum panels 102 can be applied vertically tothe studs 110. Horizontal joints of vertically-applied panels need notbe backed by the studs 110.

The horizontal joints 122 between adjacent gypsum panels 102 are coveredwith paper tape 130 and joint compound 132. Joint compound and papertape may be omitted when square edge boards are used. In otherembodiments, a nominal 3/32 in. thick gypsum veneer plaster may beapplied to the entire surface of gypsum panels classified as veneerbaseboard with the joints reinforced with paper tape.

The gypsum panels 102 can be secured to the studs 110 using anappropriate nail or screw schedule. For example, the gypsum panels canbe attached to the wooden studs with 6d cement coated nails (1⅞ in.long, 0.0915 in. shank diameter, and 15/64 in. diameter head) nailed 7in. on center. The nail heads are covered with joint compound 134 (seeFIG. 8). In other embodiments, the nail heads can be left exposed. Inother embodiments, the nail schedule can be different and screws can beused with an appropriate screw schedule.

In the illustrated embodiment, the space between adjacent studs 110 isleft empty. In other embodiments, glass fiber or mineral wool insulationbatts can be placed to completely or partially fill the stud cavities.In yet other embodiments, as an alternate to insulation batts,spray-applied cellulose insulation material can be used. The sprayedinsulation material can be applied with water to fill the enclosed studcavity in accordance with the application procedures particular to theproduct used.

The gypsum panels 102 formed according to the present disclosure areeffective to inhibit the transmission of heat through the assembly 100panels prepared pursuant to UL U305 procedures wherein the first surface104 is exposed to a heat source and the opposing surface 105 isunheated. The assembly 100 is subjected to load forces in accordancewith UL U305 while being subjected to heating. The heat source follows atime-temperature curve in accordance with ASTM standard E119-09a.Referring to FIG. 8, the unheated surface 105 includes temperaturesensors 138 applied thereto. The sensors 138 are arrayed in a pattern inaccordance with UL U305 procedures. The gypsum panels 102 are effectiveto inhibit the transmission of heat such from the heated surface 104 tothe unheated surface 105 that the maximum single temperature of thesensors 138 on the unheated surface 105 is less than about 415° F. andthe average temperature of the sensors 138 on the unheated surface 105is less than about 340° F. at about 50 minutes elapsed time whenmeasured pursuant to UL U305. The gypsum panels 102 are effective toinhibit the transmission of heat such from the heated surface 104 to theunheated surface 105 to qualify for a one-hour fire rating for theassembly 100.

Gypsum panels 102 formed according to the present disclosure areeffective to withstand the hose stream test also conducted as part ofthe UL U305 procedures. In accordance with UL U 305, an assemblyconstructed in similar fashion to that of FIG. 7 is subjected to fireendurance testing according to U305 for 30 minutes, at which time it ispulled from the heating environment and moved to another location forthe hose stream test according to U305. The assembly is subjected to astream of water from a fire hose equipped to send the water out at about30 psi water pressure for a sixty second duration.

By extension, gypsum panels formed according to principles of thepresent disclosure can be used in assemblies that are effective toinhibit the transmission of heat therethrough to meet the one-hourfire-resistance rating to be classified as Type X board under ASTM1396/C 1396M-06. In other embodiments, assemblies can be constructedusing gypsum panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure that conform to the specification of other UL assemblies,such as UL U419 and U423, for example. In yet other embodiments, gypsumpanels formed according to principles of the present disclosure can beused in other assemblies that are substantially equivalent to at leastone of U305, U419, and U423. Such assemblies can pass the one-hour firerating and applicable hose stream testing for U305, U419, U423, andother equivalent fire test procedures.

EXAMPLES

The following examples further illustrate aspects of the invention but,of course, should not be construed as in any way limiting its scope.

Example 1

The expansion characteristics of relatively low expansion vermiculiteoften used in conventional fire rated gypsum panels, such as Grade No. 5vermiculite, relative to high expansion vermiculite used in panels andmethods following principles of the present disclosure were evaluatedunder substantially identical heating conditions. In this study, 50 gramsamples of exemplary unexpanded Grade 5 (relatively low expansion)vermiculite and exemplary high expansion vermiculite (here Grade 4vermiculite) were put in three crucibles and heated in an oven for onehour under constant set temperatures of about 212° F. (100° C.), about390° F. (200° C.), about 750° F. (400° C.), about 1,110° F. (600° C.)and about 1470° F. (800° C.). After one hour of heating, the sampleswere weighed and their respective densities were measured. Comparisonsof the resulting average weight loss and density for each test sampleare listed in Tables II and III, in FIGS. 20 and 21, respectively.

The bulk density of the unexpanded Grade No. 5 and unexpanded highexpansion vermiculites in this study were nearly the same (66.1 vs. 66.9lb/ft³). The vermiculite volume did not show appreciable changes belowabout 390° F. (200° C.) but started to expand above about 390° F. (200°C.) and bulk density decreased with increasing temperature. The highexpansion vermiculite expanded significantly more than Grade No. 5relatively low expansion vermiculite under the same temperatures,producing corresponding differences in bulk densities. It also should benoted that while heating the No. 5 vermiculite from room temperature toabout 1470° F. (800° C.), which approximates temperatures experienced infire and fire test conditions, produced a volume expansion of about 290%relative to the of the original unheated volume. Heating high expansionvermiculite from room temperature to 1470° F. (800° C.) produced asignificantly greater volume expansion of about 390% relative to theoriginal unheated volume.

This study confirmed, among other observations, that for a givenvermiculite weight and density, the amount of additional expansionvolume produced by the high expansion vermiculite far exceeded that ofthe vermiculite used in conventional fire rated board. These resultsalso confirmed that one of ordinary skill would not find it obvious touse such high expansion vermiculite in any significant amount in gypsumpanels with the reduced weights and densities of panels formed accordingto principles of the present disclosure. The expansion properties ofsuch high expansion vermiculite would be expected to seriously damageand reduce the structural integrity and stability of such gypsum panelswhen exposed to high temperature conditions such as those experienced infire conditions and in fire testing conditions.

Example 2

As previously mentioned, reduced weight and density, fire resistantgypsum panels with paper cover sheets were made in accordance withprinciples of the present disclosure and subjected to X-ray microcomputed tomography (CT) scanning analysis. The panels were specimensfrom Sample Run 2, and from one of Sample Runs 3, 4 or 5, discussedbelow in Example 4. Each of specimens from Sample Runs 2, 3, 4 and 5were made with about 1280 lb/msf stucco; about 75-100 lb/msf Grade #4vermiculite; about 20 lb/msf pregelatinized starch; about 32 lb/msf HRAaccelerator, about 7.5 lb/msf glass fiber, about 2 lb/msf dispersant;about 1.5 lb/msf phosphates, and foam in an amount and compositionsufficient to provide the desired panel weights and densities. The firstpanel cover sheet was approximately 61 lb/msf heavy manila paper and thesecond cover sheet was about 41 lb/msf newsline paper. The finishedboard had an approximate ⅝ inch thickness. Samples of the completedpanels were made on different dates with a nominal weight of about 1860lb/msf (Sample Runs 3, 4 and 5) and about 1880 lb/msf (Sample Run 2).The core densities were about 37 pcf and 36.5 pcf, respectively.

Core specimens from each of the two sets of samples were analyzed usinga cone beam x-ray micro CT scan technique with micron resolution, asgenerally discussed in Lin, Videla, Yu and Miller, “Characterization andAnalysis of Porous, Brittle Solid Structures by X-Ray Micro CT,” JOM,Vol. 62, No. 12, pp. 91-94 (Mineral, Metals and Materials Society,December 2010) (“the Lin X-Ray Micro CT article”), which is incorporatedherein by reference. The data from the scans was analyzed and used toproduce the images shown in FIGS. 1-6. FIGS. 1 and 4 are two dimensionalslices of core specimens from the 1880 lb/msf and 1860 lb/msf samples,respectively. FIGS. 2 and 5 are three dimensional images of the samespecimens, respectively, consisting of 1020×1024×1626 voxels, where thesize of each voxel is 5.07×5.07×5.07 μm. FIGS. 3 and 6 present threedimensional volume rendered images of the 1880 lb/msf and 1860 lb/msfsamples, respectively showing the distribution of voids and highexpansion vermiculite (and other particulates).

The sample ⅝ inch-thick fire resistant gypsum panels formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure shown in FIGS. 1-6 include a setgypsum core comprising a gypsum crystal matrix having walls defining airvoids within the gypsum core. The three-dimensional air void sizedistribution was determined using high resolution X-ray micro tomography(HRXMT) based on a 3-D watershed algorithm discussed in the Lin X-RayMicro CT article (see also, A. Videla, C. L. Lin, and J. D. Miller,Part. Part. Syst. Charact., 23 (2006), pp. 237-245). Thethree-dimensional HRXMT image analysis with 5.07 μm voxel resolution wasused with the three-dimensional watershed algorithm to calculate anequivalent sphere diameter for the counted air voids. Table IV in FIG.22 presents the results for the measured three-dimensional air void sizedistribution by number and by volume for Sample Runs 2 and 3, Specimens1 and 2, respectively, and two additional specimens of gypsum panelsformed according to principles of the present disclosure using the sameanalytical procedures.

Referring to FIG. 22, in different embodiments, gypsum panels formedaccording to principles of the present disclosure can include a varietyof different air void sizes, size distributions, and arrangements withinthe gypsum crystal matrix of the set gypsum core. For example, the totalair voids per given sample size can vary from less than about onethousand to about 7000 and the average equivalent sphere diameter of theair voids can vary between about 100 μm to about 350 μm with a standarddeviation from about 100 to about 225. As mentioned above, such air voidstructures and arrangements permit the reduction of the core density andweight, while maintaining desired board structural and strengthproperties.

The wall thickness distribution of the gypsum core of the specimensshown in FIGS. 1-6 was determined using HRXMT based on erosion,dilation, and skeletonization operations discussed in the Lin X-RayMicro CT article (see also, W. B. Lindquist et al., J. Geophys. Res.,101B (1996), pp. 8297-8310). The three-dimensional HRXMT image analysisused the three-dimensional skeletonization procedure to calculate agypsum core wall thicknesses between air voids. Wall thickness betweenadjacent air voids was obtained by a medial axis operation and is equalto the diameter of an equivalent sphere which touches both sides of thewall. Table V in FIG. 23 presents the results for the measured wallthickness for Sample Runs 2 and 3, Specimens 1 and 2, respectively, andtwo additional specimens of gypsum panels formed according to principlesof the present disclosure using the same analytical procedure.

Referring to FIG. 23, in different embodiments, gypsum panels formedaccording to principles of the present disclosure can include a varietyof different wall configurations within the gypsum crystal matrix of theset gypsum core. For example, the total number of walls per given samplesize can vary from between about 20 million and about 35 million in someembodiments, and the average wall thickness within the gypsum core canbe at least about 25 μm. In the specimens, the walls defining andseparating air voids within the gypsum core can have an averagethickness from about 25 μm to about 50 μm with a standard deviation fromabout 10 to about 25. As mentioned above, such wall structures and theirarrangement, permit the reduction of the core density and weight, whilemaintaining desired board structural and strength properties. In someembodiments, a panel's gypsum core can employ the combined benefits ofthe above mentioned air void size distribution and arrangement, and thewall thickness distribution and arrangement to obtain substantialdensity and weight reduction, while provide acceptable strength andrelated properties.

As indicated in FIGS. 1 and 2, and 4 and 5, high expansion vermiculiteparticles are shown in their unexpanded form as white or gray particlesgenerally distributed throughout the core material. Many of thevermiculite particles are located near or adjacent to voids structuresin the core specimen, as well as interspersed throughout the structuralelements of the panel cores. In FIGS. 3 and 6, the vermiculite particlesare shown as large colored particles in various orientations suspendedin the core structure, again dispersed throughout the core crystallinematrix, often close to or adjacent to the core voids. FIGS. 1-6 alsoreflect the variations in the vermiculite particles sizes anddistributions that may occur in the core structure of gypsum panelsformed according to principles of the present disclosure.

As mentioned herein above, FIGS. 1-6 are indicative of the relativelyhigh void content, complex distribution of voids, and reduced densitytypical of the gypsum core of panels formed according to principles ofthe present disclosure. This structure is further complicated by thevariation in crystalline structures in the void walls and adjacentintermediate core structure between voids. This crystalline structuremay include needle-like crystallites, plate-like crystallites, and/orcombinations of the same, and other crystalline and amorphous elements.Such embodiments of panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure rely on the integrity of such relatively brittle corestructures to provide fire resistance, and/or other panel structure andstrength properties, such as nail pull strength, sag resistance andbending resistance.

Accordingly, as illustrated in the FIGS. 1-6, incorporating highexpansion vermiculite particles in such structures would be expected tolead to spalling, fracturing and disruption of the void walls andintermediate core areas when the panel is exposed to high temperaturesdue to the resulting very significant expansion of the vermiculiteparticle volumes (e.g. resulting in volumes from about 290% to greaterthan about 390% of the original unheated vermiculite volumes). Thiswould be expected to severely weaken the core structure causingfailures, premature cracking, or collapse of the panels. Moreover,because the high degree of vermiculite expansion occurs at temperatureswhere the gypsum core is losing volume, and potentially integrity, dueto water loss and other crystalline morphology losses and/or changes,the high degree of vermiculite expansion in the void wall andintermediate core structures would be expected to accelerate the loss ofpanel integrity. Thus, it would be expected that substantial amounts ofadded gypsum or other shrinkage resistant additives would be required toprovide structural strength necessary for fire resistance and boardstrength properties. As discussed above, and further illustrated in theexamples herein, reduced weight and density panels formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure, to the contrary, provide fireresistance capabilities comparable to much higher density and, greatergypsum content panels.

Example 3

The x-y (width and length, respectively) panel shrink resistance test asdiscussed in the above mentioned reference U.S. Pat. No. 3,616,173 (the“'173 patent”) was investigated as one way to characterize the fireresistance properties of gypsum panels formed according to principles ofthe present disclosure. As explained in the '173 patent, the extent towhich the x-y dimensions of a section selected from a gypsum panelshrink when the section is subjected to heating is one indication ofpanel's resistance to shrinking, cracking and pulling away from thestuds and supports of structural assemblies using the panels.

A set of ⅝ inch thick, approximately 3 inches by 9 inches samples ofgypsum board were used in this study were tested generally following theprocedures described in the '173 patent. The samples were cut from afull sheet of formed gypsum wallboard from Sample Run 13 mentionedbelow. (In the '173 patent, the samples were molded to a thickness ofabout ½ inch from a laboratory mixture using water instead of foam tocontrol density). The samples were positioned in a muffle furnace byplacing them upright on their long (and in this case ⅝ inch thickness)edge on a piece of insulating material, with insulating blockspositioned between the samples to prevent the core samples from topplingover. The initial x-y surface area of one or both sides of each samplewas measured.

The oven and sample were at room temperature when the samples wereplaced in the muffle furnace. The muffle furnace was heated to 1800° F.and then held for one hour after which the heat was cut off and thefurnace left to cool with its door slightly open. After the furnace andsample cooled to ambient temperature, the samples were removed and thex-y surface area of the samples was measured. The sample surface arearemaining after the heating was divided by the initial pre-heatingsample surface area, and multiplied by 100 to give the percent surfacearea remaining after heating. This number, the percent surface arearemaining, is referred to herein as the “shrink resistance” value asthat term is used herein.

Specimens from three different gypsum panel samples were tested in afirst run. In that first run, three specimens from a sample were cutfrom a ⅝ inch thick gypsum panel prepared in accordance with the presentdisclosure from Sample Run 13 discussed in Example 4 below. Thesespecimens were tested simultaneously with three specimens from each oftwo commercial board samples cut from a commercial ⅝ inch Type X boardsold under the designation “Sheetrock Brand Firecode® ⅝″ Type-X CoreBoard” commercially available from United States Gypsum Company. TheType X samples had a core density of about 43.5 pcf and board weight ofabout 2250 lb/msf.

The first sample panel, from Sample Run 13 discussed in Example 4, wasprepared in accordance with the present disclosure and was about ⅝inches thick and weighed about 1850 lb/msf, with a core density of 35.5pcf. The panel was made from about 1311 lb/msf stucco, about 27 lb/msfHRA, about 30 lb/msf pregelatinized starch, about 100 lb/msf highexpansion vermiculite, about 7.5 lb/msf glass fiber, about 1.5 lb/msfsodium trimetaphosphate, and about 2.5 lb/msf napthalenesulfonatedispersant, as well as foam in an amount and formulation necessary toproduce the desired core density. Physical testing of the panelestablished that it demonstrated a nail pull strength of about 103 lbusing ASTM test procedures.

In a second run, three specimens from each of a second commercial ⅝ inchType X board sold under the designation “Sheetrock Brand Firecode ⅝″Type-X Board” commercially available from United States Gypsum Company.The Type X samples had a core density of averaging about 41.73 pcf andboard weight of about 2250 lb/msf. Three specimens also were cut fromeach of a commercial ½ inch and a commercial ⅝ inch Firecode® C coreboard sold under the designation “Sheetrock Brand Firecode® C core. ½”and ⅝″, respectively. These boards also were commercially available fromUnited States Gypsum Company. The Firecode® C boards incorporated lowexpansion vermiculite. The ½ and ⅝ inch samples core density ofaveraging about 48.12 pcf and about 46.86, respectively, and boardweight of about 2025 lb/msf and about 2550 lb/msf, respectively.

The average values from the shrink resistance test results are found inTable VI in FIG. 24. The data above demonstrates that fire rated boardformed according to principles of the present disclosure had asignificantly superior shrink resistance, at a much lower density andweight, using this test. The average shrink resistance was about 88% ascompared to the shrink resistance of the much heavier and densercommercial Type X board samples of about 77% and about 61%. Similarresults were observed relative to the significantly denser and heaviercommercial Firecode® C panels, which demonstrated a shrink resistanceusing this test of about 74%. There was no appreciable difference in theshrink resistance using this test between the ½ inch and the ⅝ inchFirecode® C samples.

For comparison purposes, the '173 patent reported that that each of thetested ½ inch samples in its examples (unless otherwise stated) had acore density of about 43 pcf. The '173 patent further reported that atthat density, the 63 tested samples evidenced a reported shrinkresistance of from 54% (gypsum panels without small particle sizeinorganic material or vermiculite added) to about 85% (gypsum panelswith clay and glass fibers at 0.45 weight percent of all dry coreingredients).

The '173 patents samples with only glass fibers only added (0.45 weightpercent of all dry core ingredients) had reported shrink resistance ofless than about 60% (e.g. 53.7%, to 61.5%). With vermiculite and glassfiber added, and without added small particle size inorganic material,the samples had reported shrink resistance values of about 60.8%(vermiculite at 1.0 weight percent of all dry core ingredients) andabout 64.1% (vermiculite and glass fiber at 1.0 and 0.45 weight percent,respectively of all dry core ingredients). The samples with reportedshrink resistance values of about 80% or more had a substantial claycontent of 5.0, by weight of all dry core ingredients, including thosesamples with added glass fiber and vermiculite. In most, if not all, ofthe examples, little if any benefit was evidenced from the addedvermiculite used there when the amount of added clay was held constant.Therefore, it is surprising that in embodiments of gypsum panels formedaccording to principles of the present disclosure which did notincorporate significant amounts of small particle size inorganicmaterial of either clay, colloidal silica, or colloidal alumina in itsgypsum core to resist shrinkage under high temperature conditions, thoseembodiments nonetheless exhibited shrink resistance at least comparableto, if not better than, conventional Type X gypsum panels and commercialpanels using low expansion vermiculite, such as Firecode® C panels.

Thus, formulations and methods for making fire resistant gypsum panelsfollowing principles of the present disclosure can provide gypsum panelswith shrink resistance properties under this test that exceed muchheavier and denser gypsum panels, and meet or exceed such panels withsignificant added ingredients, such as clay, which were necessary toprovide desired shrink resistance.

Example 4

Several test runs on different days were made to produce nominal ⅝ inchthick examples of reduced weight and density gypsum panels formedaccording to principles of the present disclosure made using theformulation approach discussed herein, and examples of which are shownin Table I in FIG. 19. The test run samples are further described, inpart, in Table VII in FIGS. 25a-b , which also provides componentamounts, board weights and board densities (approximate amounts). Theexemplary panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure were subjected to the testing discussed in Examples 4A to 4Ebelow. Samples of commercially available Type X fire rated gypsum panelsand glass-mat gypsum panels also were obtained for comparison purposes.The commercial samples referred to as Type X panels were from ⅝ inchthick SHEETROCK® brand FIRECODE® Type X gypsum panels commerciallyavailable from United States Gypsum Company (one hour fire rated)(Sample Run 21). The commercial samples referred to as glass-mat panelswere taken from commercial ⅝ inch thick commercial SECUROCK® brandGlass-Mat sheathing gypsum panels commercially available from UnitedStates Gypsum Company (one hour fire rated).

The specimens for the densities, shrink resistance, z-direction HighTemperature Thickness Expansion and insulation testing that were takenfrom the gypsum panels discussed in these Examples, both from theexamples of principles of the present disclosure and those of commercialgypsum panels, were taken at least six inches from the edges of thepanel in one or more locations in the “field” of the panels unlessotherwise stated.

Example 4A

Specimens from Sample Runs 1 to 20 of reduced weight and density, fireresistant gypsum panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure were subject to high temperature core cohesion testingpursuant to EN 520 Gypsum Plasterboards—Definitions, Requirements andTest Method, which is commonly used in Europe as a standard for certainfire rated gypsum panels. The procedures for this test also arediscussed in the report ASTM WK25392—Revision of C473—09 Standard TestMethods for Physical Testing of Gypsum Panel Products (hereinafter “ASTMPub. WK25392”) available at the web addresswww.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/WORKITEMS/WK25392.htm or from ASTMInternational in other forms or formats.

This test evaluates the ability of the gypsum panels to withstanddeflection and mechanical strains encountered when assemblies using thepanels are exposed to high temperatures, such as those encountered infires. Under high temperature conditions, for example, the structuralelements of the assemblies, such as wall studs, may be deformed orcompromised by their exposure to the high temperatures. As a result, theassemblies may be caused to deflect towards or away from the heat sourceimposing compression and/or expansion forces on the panels.

In these tests, an about 1.75 inch by about 12 inch (24 mm by 100 mm)test specimen is mounted horizontally with a cantilever length of about10 inches (254 mm). A shear stress and bending moment are imposed by aweight hung from the free end of the specimen. The weight is suspendedabout 0.39 inches (10 mm) above a platform. The mass of the weight isbased on the thickness of the test specimen, ranging from about 10.6ounces (300 g) to about 25.9 ounces (450 g) for gypsum board thicknessesfrom about ½ inches (12.7 mm) to about ¾ inches (19.1 mm). The testspecimen is exposed to flames by two horizontally opposed Meker burnerslocated about 3.9 inches (100 mm) from the fixed end of the specimen.

The mouth of each burner is positioned about 1.0 inches (25.4 mm) fromthe adjacent face of the test specimen and adjusted so that athermocouple inserted about 0.2 inches (5 mm) from the specimen readsabout 1830° F. (1000° C.). If the specimen weakens and/or deflects, butremains intact without breaking into separate pieces when the weightcontacts the platform, then it is deemed to have passed the test. Atleast six of seven replicates must pass for the gypsum panel sample topass. The test results are expressed in terms of as a “pass” or “fail.”

The tests for the specimens from all Sample Runs used a 25.9 ounce (450g) weight. The specimens from each of the Sample Runs passed the hightemperature core cohesion test, notwithstanding the reduced weight anddensity of the gypsum panels.

Example 4B

As mentioned above, in addition to core cohesion issues, shrinkage ofthe gypsum core due to exposure to high temperatures also contributes tothe loss of physical integrity of an assembled panel structure, such asa wall unit and/or the fire barrier. A test for measuring “HighTemperature Shrinkage” was developed and reported in ASTM Pub. WK25392to provide a quantitative measure of the shrinkage characteristics ofgypsum panels under high temperature conditions. This test procedurereflects the fact that the High Temperature Shrinkage that gypsum panelsmay experience under fire conditions is influenced by factors inaddition to calcining reactions that may occur in the panel gypsum coresunder high temperature conditions. The test protocol, accordingly, usesan unvented furnace so that there is no airflow from outside of thefurnace that might cool the test specimens. The furnace temperature alsois about 1560° F. (850° C.) to account for the shrinkage that may occurin the anhydrite phases of the gypsum core structures, as well ascalcining and other high temperature effects, when exposed to the hightemperatures fire conditions. “High Temperature Shrinkage” as usedherein refers to a measure of the shrinkage characteristics of gypsumpanels under high temperature testing and sample conditions consistentwith those described herein.

Specimens of panels from Samples Runs 1 to 20 formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure were tested for the amount of x-yHigh Temperature Shrinkage they experienced under the high temperatureconditions specified in ASTM Pub. WK25392. The specimens also wereevaluated for their thickness loss or gain in these tests. The testspecimens were about 4 inches (100 mm) diameter disks cut from gypsumboard samples using a drill press with a hole saw blade. Six specimenswere required for each test, and placed in the furnace side-by-sidewithout touching each other. Test specimens also were placed on smallpedestals to allow them to heat and vent uniformly on both faces so thatthey remained relatively flat, cylindrical disks.

In order to prevent thermal shock to the test specimens, which mightproduce invalid test results due to spalling and breakage, the testprotocol was modified to place the test specimens in the furnace beforeit was heated to about 1560° F. (850° C.). The specimens were held atthat temperature for a minimum of about 20 minutes before the furnacewas shut off. The furnace door remained closed while the furnace cooled.The specimens were not removed for measurement until after thetemperature had dropped to near room temperature.

As gypsum board is anisotropic, the amount of shrinkage will varyslightly in the length and width directions. Therefore, two orthogonalmeasurements were taken and averaged to compute the mean diameter of thedisk. In these tests, two measurements at 90 degrees to each other weretaken as it has been found that this approach provides a consistent meandiameter measurement from specimen to specimen. It has been found thatthe orientation of the specimens in terms of “machine direction” and“cross machine direction” is not a significant concern for the purposesof this test. Typically, if the two measurements for a disk differed bymore than 0.01 inches (0.25 mm), then the disk was rejected and themeasurements excluded from the reported results. High TemperatureShrinkage was calculated as the percent change in mean diameter afterheat exposure, and denoted “5,” typically to the nearest 0.1% for thegroup of six test specimens.

The data from this testing is reported in Table VIII in FIGS. 26a-b anddemonstrates that the core structure of the exemplary panels formedaccording to principles of the present disclosure are significantly moreresistant to High Temperature Shrinkage, (S from approx. 2% to approx.4%), than would be expected given the reduced core density and the lackof gypsum content that is normally considered necessary to reduce gypsumpanel shrinkage.

Moreover, the samples evidence a thickness expansion, or “HighTemperature Thickness Expansion TE,” in the z-direction of about 11% toover about 30% from their initial thickness prior to heating to theirfinal thickness after heating. “High Temperature Thickness Expansion” asused herein refers to a measure of the thickness expansioncharacteristics of gypsum panels in the z-direction under hightemperature testing and sample conditions consistent with thosedescribed herein. The ratio of High Temperature Thickness Expansion(z-direction) to High Temperature Shrinkage (i.e. TE/S) provides onemeasure of the overall benefit of following principles of the presentdisclosure, and was from about 3 to over 17 in Sample Runs 1 to 20.

For comparison purposes, the High Temperature Shrinkage, HighTemperature Thickness Expansion, and ratio of expansion to shrinkagetypical of commercial fire rated ⅝ inch thick gypsum panels also areincluded in Table VIII in FIG. 26b . That data, and the typical weightand density data, are from testing of commercial SHEETROCK® brandFIRECODE® Type X gypsum panels, SHEETROCK® brand FIRECODE® Type C gypsumpanels, and SECUROCK® brand Glass-Mat sheathing gypsum panels, allcommercially available from United States Gypsum Company. As can beseen, the relatively low High Temperature Shrinkage in the exemplarypanels formed according to principles of the present disclosure iscomparable to, if not better than, commercial fire rated panels.Moreover, the amount of High Temperature Thickness Expansion in theexemplary panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure is unexpectedly substantially greater than heavier, denserconventional fire rated gypsum board, without other adverse effects.

The unexpected benefit of panels formed according to principles of thepresent disclosure also is reflected in their substantially greater HighTemperature Thickness Expansion (z-direction) to High TemperatureShrinkage ratio (TE/S) relative to the commercial fire rated panels. Therelative small High Temperature Shrinkage and substantially great HighTemperature Thickness Expansion of the exemplary panels formed accordingto principles of the present disclosure indicate that they provideunexpected fire resistance for their weight and density at temperaturesreflective of those encountered in structural fire conditions. Similarresults are also obtained with panels produced from other combinationsof constituent materials within the scope of the invention.

Example 4C

One useful indicator of the fire performance of gypsum panels inassemblies, for example those utilizing loaded, wood stud frames ascalled for in the ASTM E119 fire tests, is discussed in the articleShipp, P. H., and Yu, Q., “Thermophysical Characterization of Type XSpecial Fire Resistant Gypsum Board,” Proceedings of the Fire andMaterials 2011 Conference, San Francisco, 31 Jan.-2 Feb. 2011,Interscience Communications Ltd., London, UK, pp. 417-426. That articlediscusses an extensive series of E119 fire tests of load bearing woodframed wall assemblies, and a correlation between the High TemperatureShrinkage and thermal insulation characteristics of commercial Type Xgypsum panels and their expected performance under the E119 fire testprocedures.

A linear multivariate regression analysis was conducted on the data fromthe tests with fire resistance FR (in minutes) as the dependentvariable. The independent variables were percent shrinkage SH (asmeasured by the above mentioned High Temperature Shrinkage test inExample 4B), Thermal Insulation Index TI (as measured by the testdiscussed below in Example 4D), wood moisture content MC (as a percentby weight), and the laboratory facility of the testing LAB={0, 1}. Theresulting linear regression analysis established the followingrelationship (with a standard of error for the regression of 2.55minutes):

FR=18.3−1.26SH+1.60TI+0.42MC+6.26LAB  (1)

Assuming testing conducted in a single lab (LAB=1) and a typical woodmoisture content of 13.5%, the above relationship can be expressed asfollows:

FR=30.23−1.26*SH+1.60*TI  (2)

Equation 2 may be rearranged to indicate a predicted minimum ThermalInsulation Index for a typical commercial Type X panel in a loaded, woodstud assembly necessary to provide fire test performance under E119 testprocedures using High Temperature Shrinkage test data. The resultingrelationship may be expressed as:

TI≥(FR−30.23)/1.60+1.26/1.60*SH  (3)

For fire resistance at 50, 55 and 60 minutes. the desired TI wouldgreater than or equal to the following:

TI≥12.36+0.78*SH  (4a)

TI≥15.48+0.78*SH  (4b)

TI≥18.60+0.78*SH  (4c)

As shown in Table IX in FIG. 27, the above relationships expressed inequations 4a to 4c indicate that the listed approximate minimum TIvalues would be required to provide acceptable fire resistance under theE119 conditions at about 50, 55 and 60 minutes. The High TemperatureShrinkage values SH for the Sample Run panels and commercial panels areprovided in Table X in FIGS. 28a-b as discussed in Example 4B above.

For the exemplary panels from Sample Runs 1 to 20 formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure, the minimum TI values derived fromthe relationships (equations 4(a) to 4(c)) would be equal to or greaterthan from about 13.8 to about 15.8 at 50 minutes, from about 16.6 toabout 19 at 55 minutes, and from about 20 to about 22 at 60 minutes.These calculated TI values comparable to, if not better than, thecalculated TI values of commercial Type X, Type C (with grade 5vermiculite) and glass faced gypsum panels also reported in Table IX inFIG. 27. The calculated TI values for the commercial panels, at muchheavier weights and densities, would be equal to or greater than fromabout 13.9 to about 16.6 at 50 minutes, from about 17 to about 19.7 at55 minutes, and from about 20.2 to about 23 at 60 minutes.

As discussed below in Example 4D, the measured TI values for specimensfrom the exemplary panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure, Sample Runs 1 to 20, equal or exceeded these predicted TIvalue minimums, not withstanding their significantly reduced weights anddensities relative to Type X gypsum panels and were comparable to themeasured TI values of the Type X gypsum panel sample. Moreover, undercomparable testing using the U305 procedures discussed in Example 4Ebelow, panels formed according to principles of the present disclosureactually provided greater than expected fire resistance when subject tofire testing. Without being bound by theory, it is believed that thesurprising increased fire resistance of panels formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure demonstrated in actual fire testsis attributable, in part, to the degree of High Temperature ThicknessExpansion achieved by panels and methods of the present disclosure. Alsowithout being bound by theory, it is believed that the benefits of suchsignificant High Temperature Thickness Expansion may not be reflected inthe above relationships, as they are based on tests with Type X gypsumpanels that typically exhibit a contraction during heating (see TableVIII in FIG. 26b , Type X tests).

Example 4D

High Temperature Thermal Insulation Index testing pursuant to theprocedures discussed in ASTM Pub. WK25392 also was evaluated. Thisprocedure provides a simple, representative test of the high temperaturethermal insulating characteristics of gypsum panels. The heat transferconditions reflected in this test can be described by the energyequation for one dimensional unsteady heat conduction through the boardthickness:

Δ/Δx(k(ΔT/Δx))+q=ρc _(p)(ΔT/Δt)  (5)

where T is the temperature at a given time t and depth x in the board.The thermal conductivity (k), density (ρ), and specific heat (c_(p)) arenonlinear temperature dependent functions at elevated temperatures. Theheat generation rate q represents a variety of endothermic andexothermic reactions, e.g., gypsum phase changes and face papercombustion, which occur at different temperatures and, correspondingly,at different times.

For the purpose of evaluating the total heat conduction through thegypsum board and, hence its thermal insulating performance, it typicallyis not necessary to separately measure and describe each variablementioned above. It is sufficient to evaluate their net cumulativeeffect on heat transfer. For that purpose, the simple High TemperatureThermal Insulation Index test discussed in ASTM Pub. WK25392 wasdeveloped. “High Temperature Thermal Insulation Index” as used hereinrefers to a measure of the thermal insulation characteristics of gypsumpanels under high temperature testing and sample conditions consistentwith those described herein. Each test specimen consists of two 4 inch(100 mm) diameter disks clamped together by type G bugle head screws. Athermocouple is placed at the center of the specimen. The specimen thenis mounted on edge in a rack designed to insure uniform heating over itssurface and placed in a furnace pre-heated to about 930° F. (500° C.).The temperature rise at the center of the test specimen is recorded anda Thermal Insulation Index, TI, computed as the time, in minutes,required for the test specimen to heat from about 105° F. (40° C.) toabout 390° F. (200° C.). The Thermal Insulation Index of the testspecimen is calculated as:

TI=t _(200° C.) −t _(40° C.)  (6)

A temperature profile developed from data collected by this procedureoften shows the transition from gypsum to hemihydrate at about 212° F.(100° C.) and the conversion of hemihydrate to the first anhydrite phasenear about 285° F. (140° C.). Such data also often shows that once thesephase transitions are completed, the temperature rises rapidly in alinear fashion as no further chemical or phase change reactions ofsignificance typically occur below the oven temperature of about 930° F.(500° C.). By waiting until the specimen's core temperature has reachedabout 105° F. (40° C.) to begin timing, acceptable repeatability andreproducibility may be achieved.

The Thermal Insulation Index tests of the specimens from Sample Runs1-20 are reported in Table X in FIGS. 28a-b . The Thermal InsulationIndex (TI) data for the examples from the Sample Runs show that the corestructure of reduced weight and density gypsum panels formed accordingto principles of the present disclosure provides surprisingly effectivethermal insulation properties given their density and gypsum content. Asindicated in Table X, the Thermal Insulation Index values varied fromabout 22 minutes to about 25 minutes for the specimens from Sample Runs1-20. This indicates that a core composition formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure is a more effective heat insulatorthan expected in view of the core density for the purposes of resistingthe high temperatures experienced under fire and fire test conditions.These examples also show that the ratio of Thermal Insulation Index todensity ranged from about 0.60 to about 0.68 minutes/pcf for thespecimens from Sample Runs 1-20. For comparison, the ratio of ThermalInsulation Index to density was from about 0.55 to about 0.59minutes/pcf for the specimens from the heavier, denser commercialSHEETROCK® brand FIRECODE® Type X gypsum panels, SHEETROCK® brandFIRECODE® Type C gypsum panels, and SECUROCK® brand Glass-Mat sheathinggypsum panels Sample Runs 1-20.

As indicated by this data, exemplary panels formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure have somewhat lower ThermalInsulation Index values than the much heavier and denser commercialpanels. This might be considered an indication that the exemplary panelsformed according to principles of the present disclosure would havereduced fire resistance performance. However, when the density of theexemplary panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure is taken into account, their thermal insulation capacities(as reflected by TI to density ratios) are similar to or better than theheavier, denser commercial panels. Further, as indicated in Example 4E,the exemplary panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure demonstrated unexpected fire resistance as relative toheavier, denser commercial panels when they were used in assembliessubjected to full scale fire testing.

Example 4E

Specimens from Sample Runs 1 to 20 of reduced weight and density, fireresistant panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure were subject to full scale fire testing in accordance withthe procedures set forth in UL procedures U419, U423 and U305. Thesetest procedures call for the assembly of a test structure comprising awall assembly frame of steel or wood studs (typically about 10 footvertical studs, mounted between base plate and a cap plate of the samematerial). Assemblies using specimens of panels formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure from Sample Runs 1 to 17 weresubjected to fire testing under the U419 procedures; an assembly usingspecimens of panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure from Sample Run 18 was subjected to U423 fire testingprocedures; and assemblies using specimens of panels formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure from Sample Runs 19 and 20 weresubjected to U305 fire testing procedures.

In addition, samples of commercial one hour fire rated ⅝ inch thickSHEETROCK® brand FIRECODE® Type X gypsum panels, (Sample Run 21), andcommercial ⅝ inch thick commercial one hour fire rated SECUROCK® brandGlass-Mat sheathing gypsum panels (Sample Run 22), were subject to theprocedures of U419 and U423, respectively, for comparison purposes. TheType X panels of Sample Run 21 weighed approximately 2250 lb/msf, with acore density of about 43.5 pcf. The Securock® panels of Sample Run 22weighted about 2630 lb/msf, with a core density of about 51 pcf.

In the U419 and U423 tests, the studs were commercially available lightgauge steel studs formed from steel having a thickness from about 0.015inches to about 0.032 inches, and having the dimensions of about 3⅝″ or3½″ inches wide by about 1¼″ inches thick. The steel studs, Viper 25steel studs (Marino/Ware, Div of Ware Industries Inc), were spaced about24 inches apart in the assembly. The U305 test used #2 Douglas Fir wood2×4 studs (approximately 3.5 inches wide by 1.5 inches thick), spacedabout 16 inches apart.

The U419 test procedures are considered among the most rigorous of thetypes of UL tests as the light gauge steel studs often experience heatdeformation (typically urging the exposed panels towards the gas jetflames) due to heat transfer through the panels and into the assemblycavity between the exposed and unexposed panels. This deformation oftencauses separation of the panel joints, or other failures, on the heated,exposed side of the assembly allowing penetration of the gas jet flameand/or high heat into the assembly cavity and into the unexposed,unheated side of the assembly. It is expected that the lighter the gaugeof the steel studs, the greater the likelihood of heat deformation ofthe studs and assembly.

The gypsum panels were attached horizontally, i.e. perpendicular to thevertical studs, on each side of the assembly. Typically, twoapproximately 10 foot by 4 foot panels, and one approximately 10 foot by2 foot panel were used on each side of the frame. The 10 foot by 2 footpanel was placed at the top of the assembly, which presents a moredifficult test for the assembly than if the narrower panel was placed inthe middle between the wider panels or at the bottom of the assembly.Horizontal edge joints and butt joints on opposite sides of the studswere not staggered. The panels were attached to the frame with one inchtype-S hi/low screws on each side of the assembly, eight inches offcenter. The panels were positioned so that the seams between the panelson each side of the frame were aligned with each other. Then, the seamswere sealed with paper joint tape and joint compound.

The test type, stud type and results expressed in time (minutes andseconds) until termination of the test are indicated in Table XI inFIGS. 29a-c . In the tests following the procedures of U419, the steelused to form the light gauge studs was either 0.015 inches or 0.018inches thick. The tests following the procedures of U423 usedcommercially available steel studs made from steel about 0.032 inchesthick. Under the U419 procedures, the assembly is not subject toexternal loading. In the U419 testing, the specimens failed by exceedingprescribed temperatures limits. Under the U423 and U305 procedures, atotal external load of approximately 9,520 lb (U423) and 17,849 lb(U305) was applied to the top of the assembly. In the U 423 and U 305testing, the specimens failed by breaking under the load rather thanexceeding prescribed temperature limits.

In each of the tests, the completed panel and frame assembly waspositioned so that one side of the assembly, the exposed side, wassubjected to an array of gas jet furnace flames that heated the exposedside of the assembly to temperatures and at a rate specified by the ASTMstandard ASTM E119, pursuant to the U305, U419 and U423 procedures.Examples of the ASTM E119 heating curve are shown in FIGS. 9 and 10.Pursuant to those ASTM and UL procedures, a set of about 14 sensors werearrayed in spaced relation between the heated exposed side of theassembly and each of the gas jets to monitor the temperatures used toheated the exposed side of the assembly. Also pursuant to those ASTM andUL procedures, a set of sensors were arrayed in spaced relation on theopposite, unheated, unexposed side of the assembly. Typically, 12sensors were applied to the, unexposed surface of the assembly in apattern in accordance with the UL and/or ASTM specifications. Pursuantto those procedures, each sensor also was covered by an insulating pad.

During the fire test procedures, the furnace temperatures used followedthe ASTM-E119 heating curve starting at ambient temperatures andincreasing on the exposed side of the assembly to over 1600° F. inapproximately one hour, with the most rapid change in temperatureoccurring early in the test and near the test's conclusion. The test wasterminated when either there was a catastrophic structure failure of theassembly, the average of the temperatures from the sensors on theunexposed side of the assembly exceeded a preselected temperature, orwhen a single sensor on the unexposed side of the assembly exceeded asecond preselected temperature.

The data from the fire tests are plotted in FIGS. 9-16. FIG. 9 shows aplot of the maximum single sensor temperature on the unexposed surfaceof each of the assemblies with panels from Sample Runs 1 to 17 andcommercial samples 21, from the start of each test to the testtermination. As mentioned above, FIG. 9 also shows a plot of the ASTM E119 temperature curve used for the furnace temperatures on the exposedside of the assemblies. FIG. 10 shows a plot of the average temperatureson the unexposed surface of each of the assemblies with panels fromSample Runs 1 to 17 from the start of each test to the test termination,as well as the ASTM E 119 temperature curve used for the furnacetemperatures on the exposed side of the assemblies. As indicated by thedata plots, the unexposed side, maximum single sensor and the averagesensor temperatures for all of the assemblies were closely alignedthroughout the test, notwithstanding the very significant differences indensity and gypsum content between the panels from Sample Runs 1-20 andthe much heavier and denser commercial Type X and glass faced gypsumpanels, Sample Runs 21 and 22.

As indicated in FIGS. 9 and 10, in addition, there is an inflection inthe plots between about 50 to 55 minutes elapsed time and after theinflection point the unexposed, maximum single sensor and average sensortemperatures for each test show a sharp increase in slope. It isbelieved, without being bound by such a theory, that the inflectionpoint indicates a point where the exposed, heated panels of the assemblyare near or past the limits of their heat sink and heat insulationcapacities and thus the heat transfer through the assembly rapidlyincreases through the termination of the test. Such transmittal may bethrough the panels themselves or through one or more openings in thejoints between panels. Regardless of the specific reasons for theinflection points demonstrated by the data, it was unexpected that thetemperatures transmitted through the panels and assembly cavities, andthe rates of temperate transmittal, are comparable for reduced weight,reduced density panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure and much heavier panels with much greater core densities.

FIGS. 11 and 12 are plots of the maximum single sensor and the averageof the sensor temperatures, respectively, on the unexposed surface ofeach of the assemblies in the U419 fire tests of using panels from ofSample Runs 1 to 17 and commercial Type X Sample 21. FIGS. 11 and 12show an expanded plot of the data from 40 minutes elapsed time to 65minutes elapsed time (all tests terminated before 65 minutes). Thesedata plots show in greater detail the close correspondence in fireresistance of panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure, and assemblies made using them, to the much heavier anddenser Type X panels, and assemblies using the Type X panels up tobetween about 50 to 55 minutes.

The temperatures measured for assemblies using panels from the sampleruns of panels formed according to principles of the present disclosurecontinued to closely correspond to those of the commercial panels fromabout 55 minutes to over 60 minutes. FIGS. 13 and 14 show a plot of thedata from FIGS. 9 and 10, respectively, for the assemblies using theexemplary panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure from Sample Runs 5, 14, and Sample 21 (the commercial Type Xpanel example). This data shows that panels formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure and assemblies made using them arecapable of providing panels having a fire resistance comparable, if notbetter than, much heavier and denser commercial panels under the UL U419fire test condition for at least about 60 minutes. Similar results arealso obtained with panels produced from other combinations ofconstituent materials within the scope of the invention.

It also was noted that after about 50 minutes, the temperatures for theassemblies using panels from Sample Runs 6, 7 and 9 increased somewhatmore rapidly than the assembles using panels from the other Sample Runs.As noted in Table VII in FIG. 25b , the panels from Sample Run 6 had thelowest weight and density, and the panels from Sample Runs 7 and 9 mayhave subject to over drying. Similarly, the temperatures for theassemblies using panels from Sample Runs 8 and 15 also increasedsomewhat more rapidly than the remaining assemblies. As also indicatedin Table VII, the panels from Sample Runs 8 and 15 also may have beenaffected by over drying or impurities in the gypsum source. Withoutbeing bound by theory, it is believed that those manufacturing andmaterials conditions substantially contributed to the differencesbetween temperature profiles from the assemblies using the panels andthose from the assemblies using panels from the other Sample Runs.

Given those considerations, and the difficulty of the U419 teststandards, the data from those tests show that panels formed accordingto principles of the present disclosure nevertheless providedsurprisingly effective fire resistance given their weights anddensities. Taken together, the data from the assemblies using panelsformed according to principles of the present disclosure further showthat methods and panels of the present disclosure can provide robustfire resistant assemblies that allow one of ordinary skill considerableflexibility to adjust the vermiculite and stucco content of the panelsto compensate for significant variations manufacturing conditions andraw material quality.

FIGS. 15 and 16 are plots of the maximum single sensor and the averageof the sensor temperatures on the unexposed surface of each of theassemblies in the U423 fire tests of assemblies using panels from SampleRuns 18 and 22. FIGS. 15 and 16 show an expanded plot of the data from40 minutes elapsed time to 65 minutes elapsed time (all tests terminatedbefore 65 minutes). This data plot more shows in greater detail thecomparable heat resistance of the assemblies using panels formedaccording to principles of the present disclosure and the much heavierand denser commercial glass-mat faced gypsum panels (Sample Run 22),even though the glass cover sheets of the panels would be expected toprovide additional fire resistance in this test. This data, particularlythe data after 50 minutes elapsed time, confirms that panels formedaccording to principles of the present disclosure, and assemblies usingthem, are capable of providing fire resistance comparable to (and insome instances potentially better than) much heavier and densercommercial panels under the U423 fire test conditions.

The data set forth in Table XI in FIGS. 29a-c provide the maximumtemperatures reached by any one sensor and the average of all of thesensors on the unexposed surface of the assembly at the elapsed time of50, 55 and 60 minutes. Table XI also reports the maximum temperaturereached by any one sensor and the average of all of the sensors on theunexposed surface of the assembly at the termination of the test. In thetests of Sample Runs 6, 7 and 9, the test was terminated at 58 minutes(samples 6 and 7) or 59 minutes (Sample Run 9), and thus the maximumsingle sensor and average sensor temperatures, at termination are thesame.

For the U419 tests, a maximum single sensor temperature of less thanabout 260° F. on the unexposed surface of the assembly and/or an averagesensor temperature of less than about 250° F. at such unexposed surfaceat about 50 minutes elapsed time was considered one indication of asuccessful test and an indication that the tested gypsum panel coreformulation and manufacturing process, and assemblies using panelsformed according to principles of the present disclosure are capable ofsatisfying or exceeding the requirements for a “one hour” fire ratingunder the appropriate UL test procedures. Similarly, a maximum singlesensor temperature of less than about 410° F. on the unexposed surfaceof the assembly at about 55 minutes and/or an average sensor temperatureof less than about 320° F. at such unexposed surface at about 55 minutesin the U419 was a further indication of that panels and methods of thepresent disclosure could be used to provide a fire resistant assemblysuitable for use in fire rated applications. This was confirmed by theresults showing temperatures less than 300° F. on the unexposed surfaceof the assembly at about 55 minutes and/or an average sensor temperatureof less than about 280° F. at such unexposed surface at about 55 minutesfor many of the assemblies under the U419 test conditions.

The fact that the assemblies using panels formed according to principlesof the present disclosure demonstrated a maximum single sensortemperature at about 60 minutes elapsed time of less than about 500° F.on the unexposed surface of the assembly and/or an average sensortemperature of less than about 380° F. at such unexposed surface alsodemonstrated the surprising fire resistance of panels formed accordingto principles of the present disclosure and assemblies using them underthe standards of U419, given the panels reduced weight and density. Thatmany of the assemblies experienced a maximum single sensor temperatureat about 60 minutes elapsed time of less than about 415° F. on theunexposed surface of the assembly and/or an average sensor temperatureof less than about 320° F. at such unexposed surface demonstrated thatpanels formed according to principles of the present disclosure andassemblies using them under the U419 test standards could qualify for a60 minute fire rating under those standards.

Regardless of the specific maximum and average sensor temperatures at50, 55 and 60 minutes, the results of assemblies using panels fromSample Runs 1 to 17 further were surprising when compared to thecommercial Type X and glass faced gypsum panels of Sample Runs 21 and22. Given the very significant differences in weight and density betweenSample Runs 1 to 17 and the much heavier and denser commercial samples,it would have been expected to see much greater differences in themaximum sensor temperatures and average of the sensor temperatures ateach of the 50, 55 and 60 minute periods of elapsed time. The averagesensor temperatures for the unexposed surface of the panels from most ofthe Sample Runs 1 to 17 also do not reflect the considerably lowerweight and density of those panels relative to the commercial panels ofSample Runs 21 and 22.

As also reflected in Table XI in FIGS. 29a-c , the maximum single sensorand average sensor temperatures on the unexposed side of the assembliesusing panels from Sample Runs 18, 19 and 20 were very similar, and insome instances better than the commercial fire rated board in theassemblies tested under the procedures of U423 and U305, both of whichuse wood studs and impose weight loading on the assemblies. For example,the panels from Sample Run 18 proved an assembly with unexposed sidetemperatures that were very similar at 50, 55 and 60 minutes to thosefor the commercial fire rated panel Sample 22 in assemblies using 0.032inch steel studs tested under the U423 procedures. For the assemblyusing panels formed according to principles of the present disclosurefrom Sample Run 18 in those tests, the maximum single sensortemperatures were less than about 255° F., 270° F. and 380° F., at about50, 55 and 60 minutes elapsed times respectively. The average sensortemperatures were less than about 220° F., 235° F. and 250° F., at about50, 55 and 60 minutes elapsed times respectively. The exemplary panelsformed according to principles of the present disclosure from Sample Run18, in fact, surprisingly evidenced a comparable single sensortemperature at 60 minutes to commercial Sample Run 22, a much heavierand denser gypsum panel with fiberglass cover sheets. This result isparticularly notable as the fiberglass cover sheets on the panels ofSample Run 22 are believed to improve the fire resistance of the panelsrelative to the same panels with paper cover sheets.

Similarly, the panels from Sample Runs 19 and 20 tested in assembliesusing wooden studs under the procedures of U305 demonstrated maximumsingle sensor temperatures less than about 250° F., 260° F. and 265° F.,at about 50, 55 and 60 minutes elapsed times respectively. The averagesensor temperatures in those assemblies were less than about 230° F.,240° F. and 245° F., at about 50, 55 and 60 minutes elapsed timesrespectively.

Moreover, under the commonly-accepted UL standards, the data in Table XIin FIGS. 29a-c indicates that reduced weight and reduced density gypsumpanels formed according to principles of the present disclosure werecapable of meeting or exceeding the standards required for approval as acommercial “one hour” fire rated gypsum panel under the U419 procedures.For example, the fire test of the assembly using panels formed accordingto principles of the present disclosure from Sample Run 17 reported inTable XI, among others of the assemblies using panels of the presentdisclosure, would qualify under the commercial “one hour” fire ratedpanel standards of U419 specifications. The assembly made pursuant toU419 using panels from Sample Run 17 evidenced a single sensor maximumtemperature on the unexposed side of less than the ambient temperatureat the start of the test plus 325° F. and an average sensor temperatureof less than the ambient temperature plus 250° F. In that fire test, thesingle sensor maximum was below the required temperature until 60minutes 18 seconds had elapsed, and the average sensor temperature wasbelow its limit until 60 minutes 8 seconds had elapsed. Consequently,this test confirmed that the formulation and procedures used to make thepanels of Sample Run 17 could qualify as one hour fire rated panelsunder the U419 standards.

Similar results were observed for the example panels from Sample Runs18, 19 and 20, which were tested under the U423 and U305 testprocedures. The temperature limits used for the sensors on the unexposedsurfaces of those assemblies were calculated in the same manner (singlesensor maximum of ambient temperature plus 325° F. and an average sensortemperature of less than the ambient temperature plus 250° F.). ForSample Run 18, the single sensor temperature limit and the averagesensor limit was reached at about 62 minutes, 27 seconds and 62 minutes,35 seconds respectively. For Samples Runs 19 and 20, the tests wereterminated before either limit was reached at over 63 minutes, 40seconds for Sample Run 19, and over 64 minutes, 35 seconds for SampleRun 20. This established that panels formed according to principles ofthe present disclosure would qualify as one hour fire rating under thosetests.

The above data of Examples 4A to 4E thus demonstrate that reduced weightand density panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure, and assemblies using them, provide comparable structuralintegrity, heat sink and insulation properties (or the combination ofthe same) to much heavier and denser commercial panels, without thesignificantly greater gypsum content of those commercial panels.Furthermore, the fact that reduced weight and reduced density gypsumpanels formed according to principles of the present disclosuredemonstrated such structural integrity, heat sink and insulationproperties in assemblies using light gauge steel studs (considered amongthose most likely to deform and be adversely affected by hightemperatures) would not be foreseen by one of ordinary skill in the art.Similar results are also obtained with panels produced from othercombinations of constituent materials within the scope of the invention.

One concern during the testing, in addition, was that the panels fromSample Runs 1, 6 to 10 and 15 were subject to issues duringmanufacturing that might affect their resistance to high temperatures inthe assemblies subject to fire testing. Such issues were potential corestucco hydration problems (Sample Run 1), potential over drying (SampleRuns 7 to 10) and greater levels of impurities in the gypsum source(Sample Runs 8 and 15). The results of the fire tests indicate that suchmanufacturing issues may have affected some of the exemplary panelsformed according to principles of the present disclosure (e.g., SampleRuns 6, 7, 9, and 15). The results also demonstrate that such issues maybe overcome and/or compensated for by core formulation and methods formaking panels following principles of the present disclosure.Furthermore, the tests results confirm that any necessary adjustments tothe fire performance of reduced weight and density panels of the presentdisclosure can be made by adjusting the relative amounts of highexpansion vermiculite and gypsum to achieve the desire fire performance.

Example 5

In this Example, the panel specimens from Sample Runs 1 to 20 weresubjected to a nail pull resistance testing to determine the panels'strength properties under this commonly used criterion. The nail pullresistance test is a measure of a combination of the strengths of agypsum panel's core, its cover sheets, and the bond between the coversheets and the gypsum. The test measures the maximum force required topull a nail with a head through the panel until major cracking of theboard occurs. In the tests of this Example, the nail pull resistancetests were carried out in accordance with Method B of ASTM C473-95.

In brief summary, the tested specimens were conditioned at about 70° F.and about 50% relative humidity for 24 hours prior to testing. A 7/64thinch drill bit was used to drill pilot holes through the thickness ofthe specimens. The specimens then were placed on a specimen-supportplate with a 3 inch diameter hole in the center, which was perpendicularto the travel of the test nail. The pilot hole was aligned with the nailshank tip. Load was applied at the strain-rate of 1 inch per minuteuntil maximum load was achieved. At about 90% of the peak load afterpassing the peak load, the testing was stopped and the peak load isrecorded as nail pull resistance.

The nail pull resistance results are summarized in Table XII in FIG. 30for Sample Runs 1 to 20. As indicated in Table XII, four additionalsamples, Sample Runs 23 to 26, also were subject to nail pull resistancetesting. Sample Runs 23 to 25 were examples of reduced weight, reduceddensity gypsum panels following principles of the present disclosure andmade in accordance with the formulation of Table I in FIG. 19 and SampleRuns 1 to 20 of Table VII in FIGS. 25a-b , with the variations in weightand density as indicated in Table XII in FIG. 30. Sample Run 26 was acommercially available ⅝ inch thick commercial “one hour” ratedSHEETROCK® brand FIRECODE® Type X gypsum panel with a weight of about2250 lb/msf and density of about 43 pcf.

The average nail pull resistance values for the exemplary reducedweight, reduced density panels formed according to principles of thepresent disclosure ranged from about 73 lb-f to over about 107 lb-f.This indicates that, notwithstanding the reduced density and use of highexpansion vermiculite in panels formed according to principles of thepresent disclosure, panels of the present disclosure can achieve minimumnail pull resistance value comparable to much heavier and denser firerated gypsum panels. It also indicated that the panels formed accordingto principles of the present disclosure can achieve nail pull resistancevalues satisfactory for commercial purposes, which for ⅝ inch gypsumpanels with paper cover sheets is approximately 96 lb-f. Similar resultsare also obtained with panels produced from other combinations ofconstituent materials within the scope of the invention.

Example 6

Exemplary panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure and made in accordance with Table I in FIG. 19 and the SampleRuns 17-19 of Table VII in FIGS. 25a-b were subjected to flexuralstrength testing to determine the panels' strength properties under thiscommonly used criterion. The flexural strength test generally caninclude a procedure for evaluating the ability of gypsum panel productsto withstand flexural stresses during handling or use of the material.This test method evaluates the flexural properties of gypsum panelproducts by supporting the specimen near the ends and applying atransverse load midway between the supports. In particular, flexuralstrength testing was performed on specimen panels from Sample Runs17,18, and 19 in accordance with Method B of ASTM C473-95.

In brief summary, the tested specimens were conditioned at about 70° F.and about 50% relative humidity for 24 hours prior to testing. Foursample pieces, each 12 in. (305 mm) by approximately 16 in. (406 mm),are cut from each gypsum panel specimen, two having the 16-in. dimensionparallel to the edge and two having the 16-in. dimension perpendicularto the edge. An apparatus with parallel specimen supports spaced 14 in.(357 mm) on centers, measured at the points of surface contact with thespecimen, and attached to a plate that is rigidly attached to the testapparatus is used to support each specimen centrally on the fixedparallel supports. A load is applied on a similar bearing midway betweenthe supports. For specimens with the long dimension parallel to theedge, test one specimen from each gypsum panel product face up and theother face down. For specimens with the long dimension perpendicular tothe edge, test one specimen from each gypsum panel product face up andthe other face down. Calculate and report the average breaking load inpounds-force (lb-f) or newtons (N) for each test condition. The testconditions are: (1) parallel, face up; (2) parallel, face down; (3)perpendicular, face up; and, (4) perpendicular, face down.

The flexural strength testing results are summarized in Table XIII inFIG. 31 for specimens from Sample Runs 17, 18, and 19. As indicated inTable XIII, gypsum panels formed in accordance with principles of thepresent disclosure meet or exceed the flexural strength standards setforth in ASTM C 1396/C 1396M-06 specification for ⅝″ thick gypsum panels(i.e., 147 lb-f (654 N) with bearing edges perpendicular to the panellength, and 46 lb-f (205 N) with bearing edges parallel to the panellength).

Example 7

Exemplary panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure and made in accordance with Table I in FIG. 19 and the SampleRuns 17, 18, and 19 of Table VII in FIGS. 25a-b were subjected to core,end, and edge hardness testing to determine the panels' strengthproperties under these commonly used criteria. The hardness testsgenerally can include a procedure for evaluating the ability of thegypsum panel product core, ends, and edges to resist crushing duringhandling or use of the material. This test method evaluates the hardnessof gypsum panel products by determining the force required to push asteel punch into the area of test. In particular, core, end, and edgehardness testing was performed on specimen panels from Sample Runs 17,18, and 19 in accordance with Method B of ASTM C473-95.

In brief summary, the tested specimens were conditioned at about 70° F.and about 50% relative humidity for 24 hours prior to testing. A samplepiece for core hardness testing not less than 12 in. by 3 in. (305 mm by76 mm) was cut from the center of each gypsum panel specimen. A samplepiece for end hardness testing not less than 12 in. by 3 in. (305 mm by76 mm) was cut from one mill-cut end of each gypsum panel specimen. The12-in. (305-mm) dimension for the core hardness and end hardness samplesis perpendicular to the edges of the gypsum panel specimen. A samplepiece for edge hardness testing not less than 12 in. by 3 in. (305 mm by76 mm) was cut from both edges of each gypsum panel specimen. The 12-in.(305-mm) dimension of the edge hardness samples is parallel to the edgesof the gypsum panel specimen.

A means of securing the sample to the base of the test apparatus isprovided so that the face of the sample is perpendicular to the base ofthe test apparatus and parallel to the movement of the steel punch. Thesteel punch is positioned so that its center axis is parallel with theline of travel. The sample is secured in a fixed vertical position onits 12-in. (305-mm) dimension edge. Three tests, spaced approximately 4in. (102 mm) apart, are conducted on each sample, with the first testarea 2±½ in. (51±13 mm) from one edge of the sample. The steel punch ispositioned over the test area and the load is applied. The core, end, oredge hardness measurement is reported as the load in pounds-force (lb-f)or newtons (N) required to push the steel punch a distance of ½ in. (13mm) into the core of the sample. The core, end, and edge hardness of thespecimen is reported as the average of the three sample measurements.

The core, end, and edge hardness testing results are summarized in TableXIV in FIGS. 32a-c for specimens from Sample Runs 17, 18, and 19. Asindicated in Table XIV, gypsum panels formed following principles of thepresent disclosure meet or exceed the core, end, and edge hardnessstandards set forth in ASTM C 1396/C 1396M-06 specification for gypsumpanels (i.e., 11 lb-f (49 N)).

Example 8

Exemplary panels formed according to principles of the presentdisclosure and made in accordance with Table I in FIG. 19 and the SampleRuns 17-19 of Table VII in FIGS. 25a-b were tested for soundtransmission and a sound transmission class value (“STC”). Panels fromSample Runs 17, 18, and 19 were tested on two basic wall assembliesprepared in accordance with the UL test procedures U305 and U419. TheU305 type assembly was made from approximately 2×4 inch wooden studs,spaced about 16 inches off center. The U419 type assemblies were madefrom approximately 3⅝ inch, 25-gauge (about 0.015 inch thick) steelstuds, arranged 24 inches off center. Both types of studs were arrangedin an 8′×8′ frame.

All assemblies consisted of a single layer of wallboard on each face ofthe assembly. The assemblies, in addition, were tested with and withoutabout 3½″ of fiberglass insulation in the wall cavities. The exemplaryreduced weight, reduced density gypsum panels formed according toprinciples of the present disclosure had an average weight of about 1900lb/msf, and a core density of about 36 pcf.

The panel assemblies and the results of the sound transmission test,including STC values determined according to ASTM E90/Specification ASTME413 are summarized in Table XV in FIG. 33. The assemblies made fromsteel studs and using panels formed according to principles of thepresent disclosure demonstrated STC values about 1-2 points lower thantypically found with corresponding steel stud assemblies constructedwith the commercial, greater density Type X panels. On wood frames,however, the assemblies using panels formed according to principles ofthe present disclosure obtained STC values very similar to typicalvalues for comparable assemblies using the commercial, Type X panels. Itis generally understood that any STC difference less than 3 points isnot discernable by the untrained human ear, and thus the 1- to 2-pointoverall differences between the STC values of the examples of the panelsformed according to principles of the present disclosure and commercialType X panels and should not be noticeable to most listeners. Asdemonstrated by these tests, the examples of the reduced weight, reduceddensity gypsum of the panels surprisingly have sound transmissioncharacteristics very similar to much heavier and denser gypsum panels,in addition to their other benefits discussed herein. Similar resultsare also obtained with panels produced from other combinations ofconstituent materials within the scope of the invention.

Example 9

Test cubes were made from the gypsum panel formulations of Table XVI inFIGS. 34a-b to examine the effect of adding siloxane to the slurry usedto make gypsum panels following principles of the present disclosure.

A high sheer mixer running at about 7500 RPM for 2.5 minutes was used tomake the siloxane emulsion. The siloxane emulsion was mixed with stuccoand additives to make a slurry with 10 seconds soaking plus 10 secondsmixing at high speed of a Waring blender. The slurry was cast into2″×2″×2″ cubes and dried at 115° F. overnight. Densities were adjustedby varying the water/stucco ratio. Water absorption test method ASTMC1396 was conducted placing dry cubes in 70° F. water for 2 hours anddetermining the weight gain percentage.

The test results are set forth in the final line of Table XVI. This datashows that water absorption below about 5% was achieved with siloxaneusage of about 8 to about 12 lb/MSF and about 2.15% pregelatinizedstarch at cube densities as low as about 30 lb/ft³. This exampletherefore establishes that the presence of greater than about 2%pregelatinized starch works in conjunction with the siloxane to achieveunexpected, enhanced water resistance.

Example 10

The effects that changes in the amount of vermiculite have on thermalproperties including High Temperature Shrinkage, High TemperatureThickness Expansion, and thermal insulation characteristics of highexpansion vermiculite used in panels and methods according to principlesof the present disclosure were evaluated under substantially identicalheating conditions. In this study, laboratory samples were preparedusing 1000 grams of stucco, 11 grams of heat-resistant accelerator, 15grams of pregelatinized starch, 6 grams of glass fiber, and 2000 ml ofwater at 70° F. These lab samples were prepared using varying amountsand types of high expansion vermiculite according to the formulationsset forth in Table XVII in FIG. 35.

The lab samples differ only in the type and amount of high expansionvermiculite used in preparing the samples. Palabora micron and superfine(Grades 0 and 1, respectively) are commercially available from SouthAfrica. As shown in FIG. 19, these South African grades of vermiculiteare comparable to Grade 4 vermiculite using the U.S. grading system.Palabora Grade 0 has a particle size distribution that correspondssubstantially to commercially-available grade 4 vermiculite in the U.S.grading system. Palabora Grade 1 has a particle size distribution whichincludes a greater portion of larger particles but that overlaps withgrade 4 vermiculite samples using the U.S. grading system.

The lab samples were evaluated using the High Temperature Shrinkagetesting protocol described in ASTM Pub. WK25392 and discussed in Example4B. ASTM Pub. WK25392 and the prior discussion thereof are incorporatedherein. The data from this testing is reported in Table XVII in FIG. 35.For each sample run, six test specimens were evaluated using the HighTemperature Shrinkage and High Temperature Thickness Expansion(z-direction) testing described in ASTM Pub. WK25392. An average of theresults of the six test specimens is found in Table XVII. The testingdemonstrates that the ratio (TEIS) of High Temperature ThicknessExpansion (z-direction) to High Temperature Shrinkage generallyincreases with increasing amounts of high expansion vermiculite. Thisperformance change lessened or decreased once the vermiculite usagereached about 10% by weight of stucco. These results are consistentbetween the two different types of high expansion vermiculite used.

The lab samples were also evaluated using the High Temperature ThermalInsulation Index testing protocol described in ASTM Pub. WK25392 anddiscussed in Example 4D. ASTM Pub. WK25392 and the prior discussionthereof are incorporated herein. The data from this testing is reportedin Table XVIII in FIG. 36. For each sample run, two test specimens wereevaluated using the High Temperature Thermal Insulation Index testingdescribed in ASTM Pub. WK25392. An average of the results of the twotest specimens is found in Table XVIII. The testing demonstrates thatthe high temperature Thermal Insulation Index of the lab samplesincreases somewhat with increasing amounts of high expansionvermiculite. This performance change lessened or decreased once thevermiculite usage reached about 10% by weight of stucco. These resultsare consistent between the two different types of high expansionvermiculite used.

Example 11

Laboratory studies were conducted concerning the effectiveness of onepreferred HEHS additive, aluminum trihydrate (ATH), used in gypsum coreformulations following principles of the present disclosure. Theproperties of the sample panels made using those formulations wereevaluated in terms of High Temperature Thermal Insulation Index (“TI”),and High Temperature Shrinkage (“SH %”) and High Temperature ThicknessExpansion (“TE %”). In Examples 11A, 11B and 11C discussed below, coreformulations were prepared using varying amounts of stucco,high-expansion vermiculite, ATH, heat-resistant accelerator (“HRA”),pregelatinized starch, trimetaphosphate, glass fibers,naphthalenesulfonate dispersant, and water according to the formulationsdiscussed in each Example for the core formulations Samples 1 to 20.

The amounts of each component are provided in “parts” by weight, whichmay be in pounds, grams or other units of measure. Where a value for acomponent in a core formulation is expressed as a percentage, thisrefers to the amount of the component relative to the stucco componentas a percentage by weight. Where the amount of component is expressed interms of pounds per thousand square feet (lb/msf), the reported value isan approximate, calculated equivalent to the amount by weight of thecomponent in a thousand square feet of panel about ⅝ inch thick (approx.0.625 inches, 15.9 mm), based on the amount by weight of the componentin the formulation.

For each sample formulations, the dry ingredients were combined with thewater in a Waring mixer to provide consistent, well-mixed gypsum slurry.Then, two approximately 12 inch by 12 inch (30.5 cm by 30.5 cm) panels,about ⅝ inch thick (approx. 0.625 inches, 15.9 mm), were formed witheach sample formulations. To form the panels, the slurries from eachsample formulation were hand cast between an upper paper of about 48pound per msf and a lower layer paper of about 42 pound per msf.

Each of the cast panels was allowed to set until hydration of the stuccowas substantially completed and then was dried at about 350° F. (about177° C.) for about 20 minutes and about 110° F. (about 40° C.) for about48 hours. The water content of the formulation was used to provide theindicated weight and density of the set, dried hand cast samples. Foamwas not added to the sample formulations. The approximate values for thefollowing are reported in FIGS. 38, 40, and 41, Tables XXa to XXIIb, forthe panels formed from formulations Samples 1 to 20: panel density(pounds per cubic foot), high expansion vermiculite %, the approximatestucco weight in lb/msf, approximate ATH %, and the approximate weightof ATH in lb/msf.

From each panel, ten four-inch disks were cut. Two sets (four disks ofthe ten disks) were used for the High Temperature Thermal InsulationIndex tests. The remaining six disks were used for the High TemperatureShrinkage and High Temperature Thickness Expansion tests. The HighTemperature Thermal Insulation Index results are the average of tworeadings (i.e. the average of the readings from each of the two sets).The reported High Temperature Shrinkage and High Temperature ThicknessExpansion percentages are an average of six readings (i.e. the averageof the readings from six disks). The High Temperature Thermal InsulationIndex testing (reported in minutes, as mentioned above) was conductedusing the protocol described in ASTM Pub. WK25392 and discussed inExample 4D. High Temperature Shrinkage and High Temperature ThicknessExpansion testing (reported in % change in dimensions, as mentionedabove) was done using the protocols described in ASTM Pub. WK25392 anddiscussed in Example 4B. The data from this testing is reported in thetables in FIGS. 38, 40, and 41 in terms of the average of the resultsfrom each set of tested disks (i.e. the average of the two sets of diskstested for TI and of the averages from the six disks tested forshrinkage and expansion).

The High Temperature Thermal Insulation Index (“TI”) testing discussedin Examples 11A to 11C demonstrates that a given amount of ATH by weightis more efficient in increasing the High Temperature Thermal InsulationIndex than an equivalent amount of stucco by weight. With or without thepresence of high-expansion vermiculite, these test results show thatgenerally about 40 to 50 lbs/msf of ATH can provide a similar thermalinsulation protection as about 100 lbs/msf of stucco or more (thisstucco amount may vary by stucco source and purity). This testing alsodemonstrates that ATH may be used with high expansion vermiculitewithout any significant adverse effect on High Temperature Shrinkage andHigh Temperature Thickness Expansion properties of the panels. Thepanels of Examples 11A to 11C generally continued to exhibit HighTemperature Shrinkage values of about 10% or less and a ratio (TEIS) ofHigh Temperature Thickness Expansion (z-direction) to High TemperatureShrinkage of about 0.2 or more. In some formulations, the data alsoindicates that the ATH additive improves the High Temperature Shrinkageand High Temperature Thickness Expansion properties of the panels. Whilethese tests were conducted on laboratory-created samples, it is expectedthat comparable results would be achieved using full productionformulations and process that include the addition of foam in the coreformulation to produce air voids in the set gypsum core of the driedpanels.

Example 11A

In this example, a stucco (stucco A) prepared from a synthetic gypsumsource was used to prepare the core formulations for Samples 1 through9. Gypsum panels produced with this synthetic gypsum stucco typicallyevidence greater high temperature shrinkage relative to panels formedfrom high purity, natural gypsum. The base core formulation was madeusing the following approximate amounts by weight: 600 parts (Samples 1to 8) or 579 parts (Sample 9) stucco A; 6 parts HRA; 4.2 partspregelatinized starch; 0.84 parts trimetaphosphate; 0 parts (Sample 1)or 42 parts (Samples 2 to 9) high expansion vermiculite (0% or 7% byweight of the stucco, respectively); 3 parts glass fibers; 0.8 partsnaphthalenesulfonate dispersant; 0 parts (Sample 1), 12 parts (Sample4), 21.1 parts (Samples 2, 5 and 9), 30 parts (Sample 6), 42.2 parts(Sample 7), and 60 parts (Sample 8) ATH (2%, 4%, 5%, 7% and 10% byweight stucco, respectively); and 1290 parts water.

Each of the core formulations Samples 1 through 9 were cast into panelsand tested for High Temperature Thermal Insulation Index, HighTemperature Shrinkage, and High Temperature Thickness Expansion asmentioned above. The cast and dried panels from each of the sampleformulations had the approximate values for density, high expansionvermiculite content, stucco, ATH, and TI reported in Tables XXa and XXb,FIGS. 38A and 38B, respectively. Table XXa also reports the differencebetween core formulations having no ATH (Sample 1), and having 4% ATHwith a reduced stucco content (Sample 2), both without high expansionvermiculite. Table XXb similarly reports the difference between a coreformulation having no ATH (Sample 3), and the TI values for the coreformulations having increasing amounts of ATH with decreasing amounts ofstucco (Samples 4 to 9), all of which contained 7% high expansionvermiculite. Table XXc, FIG. 38C, reports the approximate density, highexpansion vermiculite %, ATH %, the High Temperature Shrinkage results,and the High Temperature Thickness Expansion results for the panels madefrom each of the core formulations Samples 1 to 9.

Table XXa shows that ATH can be added in an amount (here 4% by weight ofstucco) that is effective to increase the TI of the panels by about oneminute, notwithstanding a stucco reduction of about 20 pounds/msf. Thisbenefit was achieved without the use of high expansion vermiculite.Table XXb shows the effect of core formulations, Samples 3 to 9, withincreasing amounts of ATH relative to the stucco content, from 0% to ashigh as 10%, in conjunction with the use of high expansion vermiculiteat 7% by weight of the stucco.

The Sample formulations 3 to 9 provided an increase in TI from about 23to about 26 minutes. The effect of the addition of ATH in theseformulations is further summarized in FIG. 39, which plots ATH % versusthe TI in minutes of the panels made with Sample formulations 3 to 9. Asshown in FIG. 39 and Table XXb, with up to about 5% ATH, the TI ofSample formulations 3 to 6 increased by as much as about two minutes,notwithstanding a reduction of the amount of stucco in the coreformulation of about 25 lb/msf in Samples 5 and 6. Similarly, the TIincreased as much as about 3.3 minutes in Sample formulation 8, with 10%ATH and a reduction about 15 lbs/msf of stucco. The test results fromeach of the sets of Samples with the same approximate stuccocontent—Samples 5 and 6, and 7 and 8—also show that increasing theamount of ATH provides an increase in TI values.

The formulations Samples 3 to 9 with ATH also show improvements in HighTemperature Shrinkage and High Temperature Thickness Expansion results.Formulation Sample 1 without ATH and without high expansion vermiculitehad High Temperature Shrinkage of about 19% and a High TemperatureThickness Expansion of about −24%. With the addition of 4% ATH in Sample2, the High Temperature Shrinkage improved to about 9%, and the HighTemperature Thickness Expansion improved to about −11.5%. The additionof about 7% high expansion vermiculate to Samples 3 to 9 show a furtherimprovement in High Temperature Shrinkage to about 5% and in HighTemperature Thickness Expansion to about 18%, notwithstanding asignificant stucco reduction (e.g. Sample 8).

Furthermore, the formulation of Sample 9 shows that it is possible toachieve a desired TI at or above 23 minutes, while reducing theformulation's stucco content by at least about 75 lb/msf, using about 4%ATH and about 7% high expansion vermiculite. The formulation Sample 9also shows that a core formulation with such a reduced stucco contentcan improve High Temperature Shrinkage properties by reducing theshrinkage percentage at least about 12% and High Temperature ThicknessExpansion properties by increasing the expansion percentage by about 30%or more. A comparison of the panels made with the formulation Samples 3and 9, and Samples 4 and 5 shows that ATH may be substituted for stuccoat a ratio of about 1 one part ATH to at least about 1.7 to about 2parts stucco, while maintaining similar TI properties. The substitutionratios may vary considerably depending on the source of the stucco andthe core formulations. Moreover, for a given stucco formulation, thesubstitution ratios may be increased if a reduction in TI is desired ordecreased if greater TI properties are desired.

Example 11B

In this example, a stucco (stucco B) prepared from relative high puritynatural gypsum source (at least about 90% gypsum) was used to preparethe core formulations for Samples 10 through 17. The base coreformulation was made using the following approximate amounts by weight:1000 parts stucco B; 10 parts HRA; 7 parts pregelatinized starch; 1.4parts trimetaphosphate; 70 parts high expansion vermiculite (about 7% byweight of stucco); 5 parts glass fibers; 1.4 parts naphthalenesulfonatedispersant; 0 parts (Sample 10), 17.6 parts (Sample 11), 35.2 parts(Sample 12 and 17), and 70.4 parts (Samples 13 to 16) ATH (2%, 4%, and7% by weight of the stucco, respectively); and 1800 parts (Samples 10 to14), 1900 parts (Sample 15) and 2150 parts (Samples 16 and 17) water.

Each of the core formulations Samples 10 through 17 were cast intopanels and tested for High Temperature Thermal Insulation Index, HighTemperature Shrinkage, and High Temperature Thickness Expansion asmentioned above. The cast and dried panels from each of the Sampleformulations had the approximate values for density, high expansionvermiculite content, stucco, ATH %, TI reported in FIGS. 40A and 40B,Tables XXIa and XXIb, respectively. Table XXIa reports the differencebetween a core formulation, made using stucco B, with no ATH (Sample10), and the TI values for core formulations with increasing amounts ofATH and no change in the stucco content (Samples 11 to 14). Each ofthose formulations contained about 7% high expansion vermiculite. TableXXIb reports the differences in TI results between core formulationswith about 7% (Samples 15 and 16) and about 4% (Sample 17) ATH. Theequivalent of about 100 lb/msf stucco was removed from the formulationsSamples 16 and 17, and all of those samples contained 7% high expansionvermiculite. Table XXIc, FIG. 40C, reports the density, high expansionvermiculite content, ATH % and the High Temperature Shrinkage and HighTemperature Thickness Expansion results for the panels made from each ofthe core formulations Samples 10 to 17.

Table XXIa shows the benefit of adding an amount of ATH (here 2%, 4% and7%) that is effective to result in a TI increase with a constant stuccocontent, here from about 0.1 to about 1.5 minutes. Table XXIb shows theeffect of core formulation Samples 15 and 16 where the ATH % is heldconstant and 100 pounds of stucco is removed. This produced a TIreduction of 1.3 minutes, but with a TI in excess of about 24 minutes,both Samples 15 and 16 would be acceptable for fire rated applications.Sample 17 similarly shows that the ATH amount can be reduced to about4%, and the stucco amount in the core formulation can be reduced theequivalent of about 100 lb/msf, while maintaining a TI of about 23minutes. This also is considered acceptable for fire rated applications.The results in Table XXIb show that an effective amount of ATH can beused to maintain the TI at a predetermined level (e.g., about 23minutes) while lowering the amount of stucco used in the formulation.

Table XXIc, FIG. 40C, shows the High Temperature Shrinkage and HighTemperature Thickness Expansion results from the panels made with coreformulations Samples 10 to 17. These results show that using stucco Band the formulations Samples 10 to 17, the High Temperature Shrinkageand High Temperature Thickness Expansion results are materiallyunchanged with the addition in ATH. This is true even of the formulaewith a stucco reduction that is the equivalent of about 100 lb/msf (seeSamples 16 and 17).

Example 11C

In this example, a stucco (stucco C) prepared from relative low puritynatural gypsum source (approximately 80% gypsum, the remainder clays andother impurities) was used to prepare the core formulations for Samples18 through 20. The base core formulation was made using the followingapproximate amounts by weight: 1000 parts (Samples 18 and 20) or 975parts (Sample 19) stucco C; 10 parts HRA; 10 parts pregelatinizedstarch; 2 parts trimetaphosphate; 100 parts high expansion vermiculite(about 10% by weight of stucco); 5 parts glass fibers; 5 partsnaphthalenesulfonate dispersant; 0 parts (Sample 18), and 25 parts(Samples 19 and 20) ATH (0% and 3% by weight of the stucco,respectively); and 1750 parts (Sample 18), 1725 parts (Sample 19), and1700 parts (Sample 20) water.

Each of the core formulations Samples 18 through 20 were cast intopanels and tested for High Temperature Thermal Insulation Index, HighTemperature Shrinkage, and High Temperature Thickness Expansion asmentioned above. The cast and dried panels from each of the Sampleformulations had the approximate values for density, high expansionvermiculite content, stucco, ATH, and TI reported in XXIIa and XXIIb,FIGS. 41A and 41B, respectively. Table XXIIa reports the differencebetween a core formulation, made using stucco C, with no ATH (Sample18), and the TI values for the core formulations with about 3% ATH byweight of stucco, where the stucco C amount increased from theequivalent of about 1450 lb/msf (Sample 19) by to about 30 pounds toabout 1480 lb/msf (Sample 20). Each of the formulations contained about10% high expansion vermiculite by weight of stucco. Table XXIIb reportsthe density, high expansion vermiculite content, ATH % and the HighTemperature Shrinkage and High Temperature Thickness Expansion resultsfor the panels made from each of the core formulations Samples 18 to 20.

Table XXIIa shows the benefit of adding an amount of ATH (here about 3%by weight of the stucco) which is effective to increase the TI in panelsmade with those formulations by about one minute (compare Sample 18 toSamples 19 and 20). Table XXIIa also shows that the TI of the panels wasnot improved with addition of about 30 lb/msf of stucco C to theformulation (Sample 20), adding a significant amount of filler material(impurities) to the core. Table XXIIb shows that, in some formulations,the addition of about 3% ATH by weight of stucco preserve acceptablevalues for High Temperature Shrinkage (S), such as about 10% or less,and High Temperature Thickness Expansion, such as a positive expansion.In some instances, the addition of about 25 parts ATH by weigh to ofstucco can improve the High Temperature Shrinkage (compare Sample 18 toSample 19).

All references, including publications, patent applications, andpatents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the sameextent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicatedto be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entiretyherein.

The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in thecontext of describing the invention (especially in the context of thefollowing claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and theplural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted bycontext. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended toserve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separatevalue falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, andeach separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it wereindividually recited herein. All methods described herein can beperformed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein orotherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and allexamples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, isintended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose alimitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. Nolanguage in the specification should be construed as indicating anynon-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.

Preferred aspects and embodiments of this invention are describedherein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying outthe invention. It should be understood that the illustrated embodimentsare exemplary only, and should not be taken as limiting the scope of theinvention.

1. A fire resistant gypsum panel comprising a gypsum core disposedbetween two cover sheets, the gypsum core comprising a crystallinematrix of set gypsum and high expansion particles expandable to about300% or more of their original volume after being heated for about onehour at about 1560° F. (about 850° C.), the gypsum core having a density(D) of about 40 pounds per cubic foot (about 640 kg/m3) or less and acore hardness of at least about 11 pounds (about 5 kg), and the gypsumcore effective to provide a Thermal Insulation Index (TI) of about 20minutes or greater. 2.-30. (canceled)
 31. A method for making a fireresistant gypsum panel, the method comprising: (A) preparing a gypsumslurry having high expansion particles dispersed therein; (B) disposingthe gypsum slurry between a first cover sheet and a second cover sheetto form an assembly comprising a set gypsum core; (C) cutting theassembly into a panel of predetermined dimensions; and (D) drying thepanel; such that the set gypsum core has a density (D) of about 40pounds per cubic foot or less and a core hardness of at least about 11pounds, and the gypsum core is effective to provide a Thermal InsulationIndex (TI) of about 20 minutes or greater.